Retinopathy of prematurity detection: a retrospective quality improvement project before-after implementation of retinal digital imaging for screening
- PMID: 37076746
- DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-04951-z
Retinopathy of prematurity detection: a retrospective quality improvement project before-after implementation of retinal digital imaging for screening
Abstract
Screening of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) was modified in a level-3 neonatal intensive care unit by the introduction of a wide-field retinal imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) diagnosis was improved or not compared to previously used binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). This was a retrospective, uncontrolled, quality improvement project. Records of consecutive premature newborns screened for ROP over two 1-year periods were reviewed. Systemic factors potentially influencing the occurrence of ROP were investigated using uni- and multivariable linear regression followed by stepwise forward regression. ROP screening was performed by ophthalmologists using BIO in 2014, and digital wide-field retinal imaging (Panocam™ pro) in 2019. Records of N = 297 patients were analyzed (N = 159 in 2014 and N = 138 in 2019). The proportion of ROP diagnosed at any stage, over the total number of neonates screened, was significantly higher in 2019 (n = 46/138, 33.1%) compared to 2014 (n = 11/159, 6.9%) (p < 0.0001). Most neonates presented with mild forms of ROP during both 1-year periods analyzed. After adjustment for all parameters influencing ROP occurrence, the variables contributing independently to the diagnosis of any stage of ROP were birth weight (p = 0.002), duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.028) and wide-field fundus camera-assisted screening (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: After adjusting for many recognized systemic factors influencing the development of ROP, screening by wide-field digital retinal imaging was independently associated with higher ROP detection.
What is known: • No consensus has been reached to replace binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy by retinal imaging for ROP screening. • Diagnostic accuracy and high sensitivity and specificity has been reported for wide-field digital imaging.
What is new: • The introduction of wide-field imaging for ROP screening in at level-3 reference center was independently associated to higher ROP detection.
Keywords: ROP; Screening; Wide-field digital retinal imaging.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of wide field imaging by nurses with indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists for retinopathy of prematurity: a diagnostic accuracy study.BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 5;10(8):e036483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036483. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32759245 Free PMC article.
-
Wide-field digital retinal imaging versus binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy of prematurity screening: a two-observer prospective, randomised comparison.Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;93(3):355-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.148908. Epub 2008 Nov 21. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009. PMID: 19028742 Clinical Trial.
-
Alternative methods for the screening of retinopathy of prematurity: binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy vs wide-field digital retinal imaging.Eye (Lond). 2013 Sep;27(9):1053-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.128. Epub 2013 Jun 14. Eye (Lond). 2013. PMID: 23764991 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Wide-Field Digital Retinal Images in Retinopathy of Prematurity Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Curr Eye Res. 2022 Jul;47(7):1024-1033. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2050262. Epub 2022 Apr 18. Curr Eye Res. 2022. PMID: 35435102
-
Evaluation of Visunex Medical's PanoCam(TM) LT and PanoCam(TM) Pro wide-field imaging systems for the screening of ROP in newborn infants.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016 Aug;13(8):705-12. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1208560. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016. PMID: 27424884 Review.
Cited by
-
Global, regional and national burden of retinopathy of prematurity among childhood and adolescent: a spatiotemporal analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Jan 6;8(1):e002267. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002267. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024. PMID: 38184302 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ludwig CA, Chen TA, Hernandez-Boussard T et al (2017) The epidemiology of retinopathy of prematurity in the United States. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 48:553–562. https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20170630-06 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Painter SL, Wilkinson AR, Desai P et al (2015) Incidence and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity in England between 1990 and 2011: database study. Br J Ophthalmol 99:807–811. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305561 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Beby F, Burillon C, Putet G, Denis Ph (2004) Rétinopathie du prématuré : résultats de l’examen du fond d’œil chez 94 enfants à risque. J Fr Ophtalmol 27:337–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0181-5512(04)96138-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Austeng D (2009) Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in infants born before 27 weeks’ gestation in Sweden. Arch Ophthalmol 127:1315. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.244 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Slidsborg C, Forman JL, Rasmussen S et al (2011) A new risk-based screening criterion for treatment-demanding retinopathy of prematurity in Denmark. Pediatrics 127:e598–e606. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1974 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources