Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 19;23(1):380.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09338-2.

Ear and hearing care programs for First Nations children: a scoping review

Kai Nash  1 , Rona Macniven  2 , Liesa Clague  3 , Harvey Coates  4 , Mark Fitzpatrick  5 , Hasantha Gunasekera  6 , Kylie Gwynne  7 , Luke Halvorsen  7 , Samantha Harkus  8 , Leanne Holt  9 , Noeleen Lumby  7 , Katie Neal  10 , Neil Orr  7 , Elizabeth Pellicano  11 , Boe Rambaldini  7 , Catherine McMahon  7
Affiliations

Ear and hearing care programs for First Nations children: a scoping review

Kai Nash et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Ear and hearing care programs are critical to early detection and management of otitis media (or middle ear disease). Otitis media and associated hearing loss disproportionately impacts First Nations children. This affects speech and language development, social and cognitive development and, in turn, education and life outcomes. This scoping review aimed to better understand how ear and hearing care programs for First Nations children in high-income colonial-settler countries aimed to reduce the burden of otitis media and increase equitable access to care. Specifically, the review aimed to chart program strategies, map the focus of each program against 4 parts of a care pathway (prevention, detection, diagnosis/management, rehabilitation), and to identify the factors that indicated the longer-term sustainability and success of programs.

Method: A database search was conducted in March 2021 using Medline, Embase, Global Health, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and Academic Search Premier. Programs were eligible or inclusion if they had either been developed or run at any time between January 2010 to March 2021. Search terms encompassed terms such as First Nations children, ear and hearing care, and health programs, initiatives, campaigns, and services.

Results: Twenty-seven articles met the criteria to be included in the review and described a total of twenty-one ear and hearing care programs. Programs employed strategies to: (i) connect patients to specialist services, (ii) improve cultural safety of services, and (iii) increase access to ear and hearing care services. However, program evaluation measures were limited to outputs or the evaluation of service-level outcome, rather than patient-based outcomes. Factors which contributed to program sustainability included funding and community involvement although these were limited in many cases.

Conclusion: The result of this study highlighted that programs primarily operate at two points along the care pathway-detection and diagnosis/management, presumably where the greatest need lies. Targeted strategies were used to address these, some which were limited in their approach. The success of many programs are evaluated as outputs, and many programs rely on funding sources which can potentially limit longer-term sustainability. Finally, the involvement of First Nations people and communities typically only occurred during implementation rather than across the development of the program. Future programs should be embedded within a connected system of care and tied to existing policies and funding streams to ensure long term viability. Programs should be governed and evaluated by First Nations communities to further ensure programs are sustainable and are designed to meet community needs.

Keywords: Aboriginal; Healthcare; Hearing; Indigenous; Inuit; Metis; Middle ear disease; Māori.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mapping programs onto the care pathways
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mitrou F, Cooke M, Lawrence D, Povah D, Mobilia E, Guimond E, Zubrick S. Gaps in Indigenous disadvantage not closing: a census cohort study of social determinants of health in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand from 1981–2006. BioMed Central Public Health. 2014;14(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-201. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fast E, Collin-Vézina D. Historical trauma, race-based trauma and resilience of indigenous peoples: A literature review. First Peoples Child & Family Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal Honouring the Voices, Perspectives, and Knowledges of First Peoples through Research, Critical Analyses, Stories, Standpoints and Media Reviews. 2010;5(1):126–136. doi: 10.7202/1069069ar. - DOI
    1. Anderson I, Robson B, Connolly M, Al-Yaman F, Bjertness E, King A, et al. Indigenous and tribal peoples' health (The lancet–lowitja institute global collaboration): A population study. The Lancet. 2016;388(10040):131–157. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00345-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. King M, Smith A, Gracey M. Indigenous health part 2: The underlying causes of the health gap. The Lancet. 2009;374(9683):76–85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60827-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sequist T, Cullen T, Acton K. Indian health service innovations have helped reduce health disparities affecting American Indian and Alaska Native people. Health Aff. 2011;30(10):1965–1973. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0630. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms