Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;12(11):12452-12461.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.5955. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

Individualized prediction of survival benefit from postoperative radiotherapy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

Yang Wo  1   2   3 , Yizhou Peng  1   2   3 , Zhigang Wu  1   2   3 , Pengcheng Liu  1   2   3 , Yan Shang  1   2   3 , Xuxia Shen  3   4 , Yihua Sun  1   2   3
Affiliations

Individualized prediction of survival benefit from postoperative radiotherapy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

Yang Wo et al. Cancer Med. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains controversial and the eighth edition TNM staging scheme for MPM has not been fully verified. We aimed to develop an individualized prediction model for identifying optimal candidates for PORT among MPM patients who received surgery plus chemotherapy and externally validate the performance of the new TNM staging scheme.

Materials and methods: Detailed characteristics of MPM patients during 2004-2015 were retrieved from SEER registries. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce disparities of baseline characteristics (age, sex, histologic type, stage, and type of surgery) between the PORT group and no-PORT group. A novel nomogram was constructed based on independent prognosticators identified by multivariate Cox regression model. The discriminatory performance and degree of calibration were evaluated. We stratified patients into different risk groups according to nomogram total scores and estimated the survival benefit of PORT in different subgroups in order to identify the optimal candidates.

Results: We identified 596 MPM patients, among which 190 patients (31.9%) received PORT. PORT conferred significant survival benefit in the unmatched population, while there was no significant survival difference favoring PORT in the matched population. The C-index of the new TNM staging scheme was closed to 0.5, which represented a poor discriminatory ability. A novel nomogram was constructed based on clinicopathological factors, including age, sex, histology, and N stage. We stratified patients into three risk groups. Subgroup analyses indicated that PORT was beneficial for high-risk group (p = 0.003) rather than low-risk group (p = 0.965) and intermediate-risk group (p = 0.661).

Conclusion: We established a novel predictive model, which could make individualized prediction of survival benefit of PORT for MPM and could compensate for weakness in TNM staging system.

Keywords: SEER; nomogram; prognostic factor; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Survival curves of overall survival according to treatment modality in the unmatched (A) and matched (B) populations. PORT, postoperative radiotherapy.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Survival curves of overall survival according to (A) T descriptors, (B) N descriptors, and (C) TNM stage. PORT, postoperative radiotherapy.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Constructed nomogram for predicting overall survival and benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in stage I–III malignant pleural mesothelioma.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Survival curves of overall survival according to (A) risk subgroups, (B) treatment modality in low‐risk subgroup, (C) treatment modality in intermediate‐risk subgroup, and (D) treatment modality in high‐risk subgroup. PORT, postoperative radiotherapy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carbone M, Adusumilli PS, Alexander HR Jr, et al. Mesothelioma: scientific clues for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):402‐429. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andujar P, Lacourt A, Brochard P, Pairon JC, Jaurand MC, Jean D. Five years update on relationships between malignant pleural mesothelioma and exposure to asbestos and other elongated mineral particles. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2016;19(5–6):151‐172. - PubMed
    1. Nicolini F, Bocchini M, Bronte G, et al. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: state‐of‐the‐art on current therapies and promises for the future. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1519. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mutti L, Peikert T, Robinson BWS, et al. Scientific advances and new frontiers in mesothelioma therapeutics. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(9):1269‐1283. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nowak AK, Chansky K, Rice DC, et al. The IASLC mesothelioma staging project: proposals for revisions of the T descriptors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification for pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(12):2089‐2099. - PubMed

Publication types