Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 3:10:1125955.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1125955. eCollection 2023.

Measurement of diets that are healthy, environmentally sustainable, affordable, and equitable: A scoping review of metrics, findings, and research gaps

Affiliations

Measurement of diets that are healthy, environmentally sustainable, affordable, and equitable: A scoping review of metrics, findings, and research gaps

Patrick Webb et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Introduction: Research on the impacts of dietary patterns on human and planetary health is a rapidly growing field. A wide range of metrics, datasets, and analytical techniques has been used to explore the role of dietary choices/constraints in driving greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, environmental degradation, health and disease outcomes, and the affordability of food baskets. Many argue that each domain is important, but few have tackled all simultaneously in analyzing diet-outcome relationships.

Methods: This paper reviews studies published between January 2015 and December 2021 (inclusive) that examined dietary patterns in relation to at least two of the following four thematic pillars: (i) planetary health, including, climate change, environmental quality, and natural resource impacts, (ii) human health and disease, (iii) economic outcomes, including diet cost/affordability, and (iv) social outcomes, e.g., wages, working conditions, and culturally relevant diets. We systematically screened 2,425 publications by title and abstract and included data from 42 eligible publications in this review.

Results: Most dietary patterns used were statistically estimated or simulated rather than observed. A rising number of studies consider the cost/affordability of dietary scenarios in relation to optimized environmental and health outcomes. However, only six publications incorporate social sustainability outcomes, which represents an under-explored dimension of food system concerns.

Discussion: This review suggests a need for (i) transparency and clarity in datasets used and analytical methods; (ii) explicit integration of indicators and metrics linking social and economic issues to the commonly assessed diet-climate-planetary ecology relationships; (iii) inclusion of data and researchers from low- and middle-income countries; (iv) inclusion of processed food products to reflect the reality of consumer choices globally; and (v) attention to the implications of findings for policymakers. Better understanding is urgently needed on dietary impacts on all relevant human and planetary domains simultaneously.

Keywords: affordability; climate; dietary patterns; environment; equity; evidence synthesis; health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Frequency count of included pillars, by publication year.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Chord diagram of outcomes.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Geographic distribution of study country or region. This map does not include one European study and four global studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hebinck A, Zurek M, Achterbosch T, Forkman B, Kuijsten A, Kuiper M, et al. A sustainability compass for policy navigation to sustainable food systems. Global Food Security. (2021) 29:100546. 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100546 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, et al. Food in the anthropocene: the EAT–lancet commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. (2019) 393:447–92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Errickson F, Kuruc K, McFadden J. Animal-based foods have high social and climate costs. Nat Food. (2021) 2:274–81. 10.1038/s43016-021-00265-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Springmann M, Clark MA, Rayner M, Scarborough P, Webb P. The global and regional costs of healthy and sustainable dietary patterns: a modelling study. Lancet Planetary Health. (2021) 5:e797–807. 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00251-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jensen JD, Saxe H, Denver S. Cost-Effectiveness of a new nordic diet as a strategy for health promotion. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2015) 12:7370–91. 10.3390/ijerph120707370 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources