Reframing Cognitive Science as a Complexity Science
- PMID: 37078377
- DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13280
Reframing Cognitive Science as a Complexity Science
Abstract
Complexity science is an investigative framework that stems from a number of tried and tested disciplines-including systems theory, nonlinear dynamical systems theory, and synergetics-and extends a common set of concepts, methods, and principles to understand how natural systems operate. By quantitatively employing concepts, such as emergence, nonlinearity, and self-organization, complexity science offers a way to understand the structures and operations of natural cognitive systems in a manner that is conceptually compelling and mathematically rigorous. Thus, complexity science both transforms understandings of cognition and reframes more traditional approaches. Consequently, if cognitive systems are indeed complex systems, then cognitive science ought to consider complexity science as a centerpiece of the discipline.
Keywords: Complexity; Computationalism; Emergence; Nonlinearity; Self-organization.
© 2023 Cognitive Science Society LLC.
Similar articles
-
Cognitive science as complexity science.Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2020 Jul;11(4):e1525. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1525. Epub 2020 Feb 11. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2020. PMID: 32043728 Review.
-
Is cognitive science usefully cast as complexity science?Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;4(1):3-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01165.x. Epub 2011 Oct 24. Top Cogn Sci. 2012. PMID: 22253173
-
Dynamical Systems Theory in Quantitative Psychology and Cognitive Science: A Fair Discrimination between Deterministic and Statistical Counterparts is Required.Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2017 Apr;21(2):129-141. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2017. PMID: 28302187
-
Nonlinear dynamical systems for theory and research in ergonomics.Ergonomics. 2017 Feb;60(2):167-193. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1162851. Epub 2016 Apr 20. Ergonomics. 2017. PMID: 27097235 Review.
-
Learning from the body about the mind.Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;4(1):21-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01163.x. Epub 2011 Oct 24. Top Cogn Sci. 2012. PMID: 22253175 Review.
Cited by
-
Plastic, microplastic, and the inconsistency of human thought.Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 5;11:1145240. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1145240. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37342277 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A synergetic turn in cognitive neuroscience of brain diseases.Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Apr;28(4):319-338. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.12.006. Epub 2024 Jan 20. Trends Cogn Sci. 2024. PMID: 38246816 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Anderson, M. L., Richardson, M. J., & Chemero, A. (2012). Eroding the boundaries of cognition: Implications of embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 717-730.
-
- Advanced Processor Technologies Research Group. (2021). Architectural overview. SpiNNaker Project. University of Manchester.
-
- Balasubramanian, V. (2021). Brain power. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32), e2107022118.
-
- Beggs, J. M. (2022). The cortex and the critical point: Understanding the power of emergence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
- Boahen, K. (2022). Dendrocentric learning for synthetic intelligence. Nature, 612, 43-50.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources