Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of bioceramic-based sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study
- PMID: 37078493
- DOI: 10.1002/jemt.24323
Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of bioceramic-based sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study
Abstract
To assess the interfacial adaptation and penetration depth of three different bioceramic-based sealers (CeraSeal, EndoSeal MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG) compared to an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) in oval root canals. Fourty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar with oval canal were prepared and randomly allocated according to the obturation into; CeraSeal, EndoSeal MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG and AH Plus. The roots were sectioned at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. The sealer adaptation and the penetration depth were evaluated under confocal laser scanning microscope. One-way ANOVA and Repeated measure ANOVA were used to statistically analyze the data. Nishika Canal Sealer BG showed significantly higher sealer adaptation than EndoSeal MTA (P < .001) at apical and middle thirds. Meanwhile, AH Plus showed significantly higher sealer adaptation than EndoSeal MTA (P = 0.011) at middle third. For sealer penetration, Nishika Canal Sealer BG showed the longest sealer penetration that was significant compared to AH Plus (P < .001) and EndoSeal MTA (P < .001) whereas CeraSeal was significantly higher than EndoSeal MTA (P = 0.029) at coronal third. For AH Plus, there was a significant less sealer penetration at coronal third compared to apical and middle thirds (P < .05). Whereas for EndoSeal MTA, the coronal third has significant less penetration compared to the middle third (P = 0.032). Endoseal has the lowest adaptation and penetration depth. Nishika Canal Sealer BG has better adaptation and penetration depth using single cone obturation technique in oval canal. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: All the tested root canal sealers have some percentage of gaps and vary in their penetration capability into dentinal tubules. Nishika Canal Sealer BG has significantly better sealer adaptation to root dentinal walls than that of EndoSeal MTA at the apical and middle third but not significantly different from other type of sealers used. Nishika Canal Sealer BG has significantly better penetration depth than AH Plus and EndoSeal MTA at the coronal third of radicular dentin.
Keywords: adaptation; bioceramic; endodontic sealers; penetration; single cone.
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
The Effect of Primary Root Canal Treatment on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Calcium Silicate-based Sealers during Endodontic Retreatment.J Endod. 2022 Sep;48(9):1169-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 3. J Endod. 2022. PMID: 35667566
-
Comparison of dentin penetration ability of different root canal sealers used with different obturation methods.Microsc Res Tech. 2020 Dec;83(12):1544-1551. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23548. Epub 2020 Jul 31. Microsc Res Tech. 2020. PMID: 32735400
-
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Lasers Surg Med. 2016. PMID: 26774730
-
Influence of bioceramic sealers on dentinal tubule penetration and antimicrobial effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.Odontology. 2024 Jul;112(3):672-699. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00904-6. Epub 2024 Feb 19. Odontology. 2024. PMID: 38374511
-
Effect of ultrasonic activation of endodontic sealers on root canal filling quality during the single-cone obturation procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of laboratory-based studies.Odontology. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01075-8. Online ahead of print. Odontology. 2025. PMID: 40193004 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment using C-root SP combined with different obturation techniques in older patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 15;25(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06117-9. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40375218 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using different sealers and techniques of obturation in 237 patients: A retrospective study.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 10;28(9):479. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05871-4. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 39126493 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the penetration, interfacial adaptation, and push-out bond strength of four bioceramic-based root canal sealers.BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 21;25(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06124-w. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40399906 Free PMC article.
-
Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements.Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 Jun 4;11:40863. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40863. eCollection 2024. Biomater Investig Dent. 2024. PMID: 38903777 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interfacial adaptation of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer.J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024 Spring;18(2):115-122. doi: 10.34172/joddd.40729. Epub 2024 Jun 24. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024. PMID: 39071217 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abedi-Amin, A., Luzi, A., Giovarruscio, M., Paolone, G., Darvizeh, A., Agulló, V. V., & Sauro, S. (2017). Innovative root-end filling materials based on calcium-silicates and calcium-phosphates. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 28(2), 1-10.
-
- Abusteit, O. E. (2021). Evaluation of resin sealer penetration of dentin following different final rinses for endodontic irrigation using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Australian Endodontic Journal, 47(2), 195-201.
-
- Akman, M., Akman, S., Derinbay, O., & Belli, S. (2010). Evaluation of gaps or voids occurring in roots filled with three different sealers. European Journal of Dentistry, 4(2), 101-109.
-
- Al-Haddad, A., Kasim, N. H. A., & Ab Aziz, Z. A. C. (2015). Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Dental materials journal, 34(4), 516-521.
-
- Almeida, L. H. S., Moraes, R. R., Morgental, R. D., & Pappen, F. G. (2017). Are premixed calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers comparable to conventional materials? A systematic review of in vitro studies. Journal of Endodontics, 43(4), 527-535.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous