Performance of 20 rapid antigen detection tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variants using a clinical specimen panel from January 2022, Berlin, Germany
- PMID: 37078884
- PMCID: PMC10283455
- DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.16.2200615
Performance of 20 rapid antigen detection tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variants using a clinical specimen panel from January 2022, Berlin, Germany
Abstract
BackgroundThere are conflicting reports on the performance of rapid antigen detection tests (RDT) in the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant; however, these tests continue to be used frequently to detect potentially contagious individuals with high viral loads.AimThe aim of this study was to investigate comparative detection of the Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron variants by using a selection of 20 RDT and a limited panel of pooled combined oro- and nasopharyngeal clinical Delta and Omicron specimens.MethodsWe tested 20 CE-marked RDT for their performance to detect SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron by using a panel of pooled clinical specimens collected in January 2022 in Berlin, Germany.ResultsWe observed equivalent detection performance for Delta and Omicron for most RDT, and sensitivity was widely in line with our previous pre-Delta/Omicron evaluation. Some variation for individual RDT was observed either for Delta vs Omicron detection, or when compared with the previous evaluation, which may be explained both by different panel sizes resulting in different data robustness and potential limitation of batch-to-batch consistency. Additional experiments with three RDT using non-pooled routine clinical samples confirmed comparable performance to detect Delta vs Omicron. Overall, RDT that were previously positively evaluated retained good performance also for Delta and Omicron variants.ConclusionOur findings suggest that currently available RDT are sufficient for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants.
Keywords: B.1.1.529 (Omicron); B.1.617.2 (Delta); SARS-CoV-2; rapid antigen detection test.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test sensitivity and viral load in newly symptomatic hospital employees in Berlin, Germany, December, 2020 to February, 2022: an observational study.Lancet Microbe. 2024 Jun;5(6):e538-e546. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00412-3. Epub 2024 May 14. Lancet Microbe. 2024. PMID: 38759669
-
Decreased Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Test Is Associated with a Lower Viral Load of Omicron than Delta SARS-CoV-2 Variant.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0192222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01922-22. Epub 2022 Sep 20. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 36125269 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Rapid Antigen Tests' Performance between Delta (B.1.61.7; AY.X) and Omicron (B.1.1.529; BA1) Variants of SARS-CoV-2: Secondary Analysis from a Serial Home Self-Testing Study.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Mar 2:2022.02.27.22271090. doi: 10.1101/2022.02.27.22271090. medRxiv. 2022. PMID: 35262091 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Comparative evaluation of RT-PCR and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 detection: performance, variant specificity, and clinical implications.Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0007324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00073-24. Epub 2024 Apr 29. Microbiol Spectr. 2024. PMID: 38683014 Free PMC article.
-
Virus variant-specific clinical performance of SARS coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from November 2020 to January 2022.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Feb;29(2):225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 24. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023. PMID: 36028089 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 10;18(8):e0289990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289990. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37561721 Free PMC article.
-
The Suitability of RNA from Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Whole Virus Genome Sequencing and Variant Identification to Maintain Genomic Surveillance.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 7;13(24):3618. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13243618. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38132202 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of 3 Mpox Lateral Flow Assays for Antigen Detection, Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Kingdom.Emerg Infect Dis. 2025 Jun;31(6):1140-1148. doi: 10.3201/eid3106.250166. Epub 2025 May 2. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 40314794 Free PMC article.
-
vPro-MS enables identification of human-pathogenic viruses from patient samples by untargeted proteomics.Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 31;16(1):7041. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62469-4. Nat Commun. 2025. PMID: 40744923 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests: an implementation guide. Geneva: WHO; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017740
-
- de Michelena P, Torres I, Ramos-García Á, Gozalbes V, Ruiz N, Sanmartín A, et al. Real-life performance of a COVID-19 rapid antigen detection test targeting the SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein for diagnosis of COVID-19 due to the Omicron variant. J Infect. 2022;84(5):e64-6. 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.02.022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Schrom J, Marquez C, Pilarowski G, Wang CY, Mitchell A, Puccinelli R, et al. Comparison of SARS Co-V-2 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and BinaxNOW rapid antigen tests at a community site during an Omicron surge: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med. 2022;75(5):682-90. 10.7326/M22-0202 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous