Examination of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of the Online Personalised Training in Memory Strategies for Everyday Program for Older Adults: Single-Arm Pre-Post Trial
- PMID: 37079356
- PMCID: PMC10160943
- DOI: 10.2196/41712
Examination of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of the Online Personalised Training in Memory Strategies for Everyday Program for Older Adults: Single-Arm Pre-Post Trial
Abstract
Background: Memory strategy training for older adults helps maintain and improve cognitive health but is traditionally offered face-to-face, which is resource intensive, limits accessibility, and is challenging during a pandemic. Web-based interventions, such as the Online Personalised Training in Memory Strategies for Everyday (OPTIMiSE) program, may overcome such barriers.
Objective: We report on OPTIMiSE's feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy.
Methods: Australians aged ≥60 years reporting subjective cognitive decline participated in this single-arm pre-post web-based intervention. OPTIMiSE is a 6-module web-based program offered over 8-weeks with a 3-month booster. It has a problem-solving approach to memory issues, focusing on psychoeducation about memory and aging, knowledge and practice of compensatory memory strategies, and personalized content related to individual priorities. We examined the feasibility (recruitment, attrition, and data collection), acceptability (recommendation to others, suggestions for improvement, and withdrawal reasons), and efficacy (change in goal satisfaction, strategy knowledge and use, self-reported memory, memory satisfaction and knowledge, and mood; thematic content analysis of the most significant change; and the application of knowledge and strategies in daily life) of OPTIMiSE.
Results: OPTIMiSE was feasible, demonstrated by strong interest (633 individuals screened), a satisfactory level of attrition (158/312, 50.6%), and minimal missing data from those completing the intervention. It was acceptable, with 97.4% (150/154) of participants agreeing they would recommend OPTIMiSE, the main suggestion for improvement being more time to complete modules, and withdrawal reasons similar to those in in-person interventions. OPTIMiSE was also efficacious, with linear mixed-effects analyses revealing improvements, of moderate to large effect sizes, across all primary outcomes (all P<.001): memory goal satisfaction (Cohen d after course=1.24; Cohen d at 3-month booster=1.64), strategy knowledge (Cohen d after course=0.67; Cohen d at 3-month booster=0.72) and use (Cohen d after course=0.79; Cohen d at 3-month booster=0.90), self-reported memory (Cohen d after course=0.80; Cohen d at 3-month booster=0.83), memory satisfaction (Cohen d after course=1.25; Cohen d at 3-month booster=1.29) and knowledge (Cohen d after course=0.96; Cohen d at 3-month booster=0.26), and mood (Cohen d after course=-0.35; nonsignificant Cohen d at booster). Furthermore, the most significant changes reported by participants (strategy use, improvements in daily life, reduced concern about memory, confidence and self-efficacy, and sharing and shame busting with others) reflected the course objectives and were consistent with themes arising from previous in-person interventions. At the 3-month booster, many participants reported continued implementation of knowledge and strategies in their daily lives.
Conclusions: This feasible, acceptable, and efficacious web-based program has the potential to enable access to evidence-based memory interventions for older adults worldwide. Notably, the changes in knowledge, beliefs, and strategy use continued beyond the initial program. This is particularly important for supporting the growing number of older adults living with cognitive concerns.
Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000979954; https://tinyurl.com/34cdantv.
International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.3233/ADR-200251.
Keywords: cognition; internet-based intervention; learning; mobile phone; social support; subjective cognitive decline.
©Kerryn Pike, Carl I Moller, Christina Bryant, Maree Farrow, Duy P Dao, Kathryn A Ellis. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 20.04.2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Online Personalised Training in Memory Strategies for Everyday (OPTIMiSE) Program for Older Adults with Cognitive Concerns: Pilot Study Protocol.J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2021 Feb 24;5(1):143-152. doi: 10.3233/ADR-200251. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2021. PMID: 33782667 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Web-Based Cognitive Bias Modification Program for Young People With Social Anxiety and Hazardous Alcohol Use: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy Study.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Oct 25;7:e46008. doi: 10.2196/46008. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37878363 Free PMC article.
-
A Mindfulness-Based Lifestyle Intervention for Dementia Risk Reduction: Protocol for the My Healthy Brain Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 21;13:e64149. doi: 10.2196/64149. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 39571150 Free PMC article.
-
The Efficacy of Cognitive Intervention in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): a Meta-Analysis of Outcomes on Neuropsychological Measures.Neuropsychol Rev. 2017 Dec;27(4):440-484. doi: 10.1007/s11065-017-9363-3. Epub 2017 Dec 27. Neuropsychol Rev. 2017. PMID: 29282641 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive interventions among older adults.Annu Rev Nurs Res. 1999;17:219-40. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 1999. PMID: 10418659 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Implementation of Cognitive (Neuropsychological) Interventions for Older Adults in Clinical or Community Settings: A Scoping Review.Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Nov 6. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09650-6. Online ahead of print. Neuropsychol Rev. 2024. PMID: 39503901 Review.
-
Comparative efficacy of cognitive training modalities in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Aug;12(7):100207. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100207. Epub 2025 May 27. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025. PMID: 40436677 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale and protocol of the LEAD 2.0 study: a randomized controlled trial assessing the feasibility of a virtually delivered 6-month exercise and nutrition intervention in older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD).Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 May 10;11(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01626-4. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025. PMID: 40349092 Free PMC article.
-
Nurses' Experiences of Providing Dysphagia Services Through the Internet+Nursing Service Care Model: Qualitative Study.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 30;27:e67572. doi: 10.2196/67572. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40587779 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Discontinuous Usage Behavior of Digital Cognitive Training Among Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Family Members: Qualitative Study Using the Extended Model of IT Continuance.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 25;27:e66393. doi: 10.2196/66393. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40132189 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jonker C, Geerlings MI, Schmand B. Are memory complaints predictive for dementia? A review of clinical and population-based studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;15(11):983–91. doi: 10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11<983::aid-gps238>3.0.co;2-5.10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11<983::AID-GPS238>3.0.CO;2-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Slavin MJ, Brodaty H, Kochan NA, Crawford JD, Trollor JN, Draper B, Sachdev PS. Prevalence and predictors of “subjective cognitive complaints” in the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;18(8):701–10. doi: 10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181df49fb.S1064-7481(12)60149-3 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous