Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Aug;116(2):246-253.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.04.015. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

Food Deserts Increase Readmission After Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Food Deserts Increase Readmission After Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study

Joseph D Phillips et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Food deserts are low-income census tracts with poor access to supermarkets and are associated with worse outcomes in breast, colon, and a small number of esophageal cancer patients. This study investigated residency in food deserts on readmission rates in a multi-institutional cohort of esophageal cancer patients undergoing trimodality therapy.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent trimodality therapy at 6 high-volume institutions from January 2015 to July 2019 was performed. Food desert status was defined by the United States Department of Agriculture by patient ZIP Code. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission after esophagectomy. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression was used to model readmission on food desert status adjusted for diabetes, insurance type, length of stay, and any complication, treating the institution as a random factor.

Results: Of the 453 records evaluated, 425 were included in the analysis. Seventy-three patients (17.4%) resided in a food desert. Univariate analysis demonstrated food desert patients had significantly increased 30-day readmission. No differences were seen in length of stay, complications, or 30-day mortality. In the adjusted logistic regression model, residing in a food desert remained a significant risk factor for readmission (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.07-4.15). There were no differences in 30-day, 90-day, or 1-year mortality based on food desert status, although readmission was associated with worse 90-day and 1-year mortality.

Conclusions: Food desert residence was associated with 30-day readmission after esophagectomy in patients undergoing trimodality treatment for esophageal cancer in this multi-institutional population. Identification of patients residing in a food desert may allow surgeons to focus preventative interventions during treatment and postoperatively to improve outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURES

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Diagram of patients included and excluded.

Comment in

References

    1. American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society—Cancer Facts & Statistics. Cancer Statistics Center. Esophagus. Published 2022. Accessed January 1, 2023. https://cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/#!/cancer-site/Esophagus
    1. Eyck BM, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, et al. Ten-year outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer: the randomized controlled CROSS Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1995–2004. - PubMed
    1. van Kooten RT, Voeten DM, Steyerberg EW, et al. Patient-related prognostic factors for anastomotic leakage, major complications, and short-term mortality following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:1358–1373. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stitzenberg KB, Chang YK, Smith AB, Nielsen ME. Exploring the burden of inpatient readmissions after major cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:455–464. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fernandez FG, Khullar O, Force SD, et al. Hospital readmission is associated with poor survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:292–297. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types