Food Deserts Increase Readmission After Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study
- PMID: 37080374
- PMCID: PMC10631468
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.04.015
Food Deserts Increase Readmission After Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study
Abstract
Background: Food deserts are low-income census tracts with poor access to supermarkets and are associated with worse outcomes in breast, colon, and a small number of esophageal cancer patients. This study investigated residency in food deserts on readmission rates in a multi-institutional cohort of esophageal cancer patients undergoing trimodality therapy.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent trimodality therapy at 6 high-volume institutions from January 2015 to July 2019 was performed. Food desert status was defined by the United States Department of Agriculture by patient ZIP Code. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission after esophagectomy. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression was used to model readmission on food desert status adjusted for diabetes, insurance type, length of stay, and any complication, treating the institution as a random factor.
Results: Of the 453 records evaluated, 425 were included in the analysis. Seventy-three patients (17.4%) resided in a food desert. Univariate analysis demonstrated food desert patients had significantly increased 30-day readmission. No differences were seen in length of stay, complications, or 30-day mortality. In the adjusted logistic regression model, residing in a food desert remained a significant risk factor for readmission (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.07-4.15). There were no differences in 30-day, 90-day, or 1-year mortality based on food desert status, although readmission was associated with worse 90-day and 1-year mortality.
Conclusions: Food desert residence was associated with 30-day readmission after esophagectomy in patients undergoing trimodality treatment for esophageal cancer in this multi-institutional population. Identification of patients residing in a food desert may allow surgeons to focus preventative interventions during treatment and postoperatively to improve outcomes.
Copyright © 2023 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
DISCLOSURES
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Comment in
-
Are Food Deserts Just a Proxy for Socioeconomic Status?Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Aug;116(2):253-254. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.04.039. Epub 2023 May 12. Ann Thorac Surg. 2023. PMID: 37178861 No abstract available.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society—Cancer Facts & Statistics. Cancer Statistics Center. Esophagus. Published 2022. Accessed January 1, 2023. https://cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/#!/cancer-site/Esophagus
-
- Eyck BM, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, et al. Ten-year outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer: the randomized controlled CROSS Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1995–2004. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical