Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul:180:22-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

Endothelial cell direct reprogramming: Past, present, and future

Affiliations
Review

Endothelial cell direct reprogramming: Past, present, and future

Seonggeon Cho et al. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Ischemic cardiovascular disease still remains as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality despite various medical, surgical, and interventional therapy. As such, cell therapy has emerged as an attractive option because it tackles underlying problem of the diseases by inducing neovascularization in ischemic tissue. After overall failure of adult stem or progenitor cells, studies attempted to generate endothelial cells (ECs) from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs). While endothelial cells (ECs) differentiated from PSCs successfully induced vascular regeneration, differentiating volatility and tumorigenic potential is a concern for their clinical applications. Alternatively, direct reprogramming strategies employ lineage-specific factors to change cell fate without achieving pluripotency. ECs have been successfully reprogrammed via ectopic expression of transcription factors (TFs) from endothelial lineage. The reprogrammed ECs induced neovascularization in vitro and in vivo and thus demonstrated their therapeutic value in animal models of vascular insufficiency. Methods of delivering reprogramming factors include lentiviral or retroviral vectors and more clinically relevant, non-integrative adenoviral and episomal vectors. Most studies made use of fibroblast as a source cell for reprogramming, but reprogrammability of other clinically relevant source cell types has to be evaluated. Specific mechanisms and small molecules that are involved in the aforementioned processes tackles challenges associated with direct reprogramming efficiency and maintenance of reprogrammed EC characteristics. After all, this review provides summary of past and contemporary methods of direct endothelial reprogramming and discusses the future direction to overcome these challenges to acquire clinically applicable reprogrammed ECs.

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; Cell therapy; Direct reprogramming; Endothelial cells; Neovascularization; Regenerative medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest Y-s Yoon is a co-founder of KarisBio Inc., but has no competing interests, as the work presented was performed independently. Other authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Methods of direct endothelial reprogramming with various source cell types. Fibroblasts, human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs), mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs), and human amniotic fluid-derived cells (hACs) were reprogrammed into endothelial cells (ECs). A. The diagram showing origin of the source cells. B. The graphic showing source cell types, reprogramming methods, and target cell. Alphabets from A-N indicate studies as referred from Table 1.

References

    1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Cheng S, Delling FN, Elkind MSV, Evenson KR, Ferguson JF, Gupta DK, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Lee CD, Lewis TT, Liu J, Loop MS, Lutsey PL, Ma J, Mackey J, Martin SS, Matchar DB, Mussolino ME, Navaneethan SD, Perak AM, Roth GA, Samad Z, Satou GM, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Shay CM, Stokes A, VanWagner LB, Wang N-Y, Tsao CW, n. null, Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2021 Update, Circulation 143(8) (2021) e254–e743. - PubMed
    1. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Loewe C, Dick P, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, Schlager O, Cejna M, Lammer J, Minar E, Balloon Angioplasty versus Implantation of Nitinol Stents in the Superficial Femoral Artery, New England Journal of Medicine 354(18) (2006) 1879–1888. - PubMed
    1. Serruys PW, Morice M-C, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Ståhle E, Feldman TE, van den Brand M, Bass EJ, Van Dyck N, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease, New England Journal of Medicine 360(10) (2009) 961–972. - PubMed
    1. Weintraub WS, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Weiss JM, O’Brien SM, Peterson ED, Kolm P, Zhang Z, Klein LW, Shaw RE, McKay C, Ritzenthaler LL, Popma JJ, Messenger JC, Shahian DM, Grover FL, Mayer JE, Shewan CM, Garratt KN, Moussa ID, Dangas GD, Edwards FH, Comparative Effectiveness of Revascularization Strategies, New England Journal of Medicine 366(16) (2012) 1467–1476. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waldo SW, Secemsky EA, O’Brien C, Kennedy KF, Pomerantsev E, Sundt TM, McNulty EJ, Scirica BM, Yeh RW, Surgical Ineligibility and Mortality Among Patients With Unprotected Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Circulation 130(25) (2014) 2295–2301. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types