Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul;14(4):718-738.
doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

Ultraprocessed Foods and Obesity Risk: A Critical Review of Reported Mechanisms

Affiliations
Review

Ultraprocessed Foods and Obesity Risk: A Critical Review of Reported Mechanisms

Vinicius M Valicente et al. Adv Nutr. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Epidemiologic evidence supports a positive association between ultraprocessed food (UPF) consumption and body mass index. This has led to recommendations to avoid UPFs despite very limited evidence establishing causality. Many mechanisms have been proposed, and this review critically aimed to evaluate selected possibilities for specificity, clarity, and consistency related to food choice (i.e., low cost, shelf-life, food packaging, hyperpalatability, and stimulation of hunger/suppression of fullness); food composition (i.e., macronutrients, food texture, added sugar, fat and salt, energy density, low-calorie sweeteners, and additives); and digestive processes (i.e., oral processing/eating rate, gastric emptying time, gastrointestinal transit time, and microbiome). For some purported mechanisms (e.g., fiber content, texture, gastric emptying, and intestinal transit time), data directly contrasting the effects of UPF and non-UPF intake on the indices of appetite, food intake, and adiposity are available and do not support a unique contribution of UPFs. In other instances, data are not available (e.g., microbiome and food additives) or are insufficient (e.g., packaging, food cost, shelf-life, macronutrient intake, and appetite stimulation) to judge the benefits versus the risks of UPF avoidance. There are yet other evoked mechanisms in which the preponderance of evidence indicates ingredients in UPFs actually moderate body weight (e.g., low-calorie sweetener use for weight management; beverage consumption as it dilutes energy density; and higher fat content because it reduces glycemic responses). Because avoidance of UPFs holds potential adverse effects (e.g., reduced diet quality, increased risk of food poisoning, and food wastage), it is imprudent to make recommendations regarding their role in diets before causality and plausible mechanisms have been verified.

Keywords: NOVA; appetite; diet; eating rate; food intake; hunger; hyperpalatable; obesity; ultraprocessed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Adult obesity facts [Internet], Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html Available from: Published May 17, 2022.
    1. Health Risks of Overweight & Obesity [Internet], National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Available from: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/weight-management/adult-ove... (Published February 2018; Accessed December 8, 2022).
    1. Waters H., Graf M. Milken Institute; Santa Monica, California: October 2018. America's Obesity Crisis: The Health and Economic Costs of Excess Weight.
    1. Bhupathiraju S.N., Hu F.B. Epidemiology of obesity and diabetes and their cardiovascular complications. Circ. Res. 2016;118(11):1723–1735. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306825. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services . US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; Rockville, MD, January: 2010. The Surgeon General’s Vision for a Healthy and Fit Nation.