Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;52(5):747-755.
doi: 10.1111/vsu.13962. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

Influence of closed glove exchange on bacterial contamination of the hands of the surgical team

Affiliations

Influence of closed glove exchange on bacterial contamination of the hands of the surgical team

Kathryn Biehl et al. Vet Surg. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if closed glove exchange (CGE) increases hand contamination.

Study design: Prospective experimental study.

Sample population: Surgical teams participating in 65 individual surgical procedures were included, resulting in 200 individual enrollments.

Methods: At the completion of surgery, gloves were removed and hands were swabbed. The inside of the gown cuff was swabbed. Each participant regloved, using a closed gloving technique. The new gloves were removed, and hands were swabbed for culture a second time. Swabs underwent standard bacterial culture.

Results: Before glove exchange, or baseline, contamination was found on 17/200 dominant hands and 13/200 nondominant hands. After performing CGE, contamination was found on 14/200 and 15/200 dominant and nondominant hands, respectively. No difference was detected between the number of CFUs cultured from a surgeon's hands before CGE and the number of CFUs cultured from a surgeon's hands post-CGE (one sided sign test, p = .61). Twelve (12) different bacterial species were identified, the most common were Staphylococcus spp. (97/154; 63%).

Conclusion: Closed glove exchange did not increase bacterial hand contamination over baseline levels.

Clinical significance: We found no evidence to support discontinuing CGE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. Vasseur PB, Paul HA, Enos LR, Hirsh DC. Infection rates in clean surgical procedures: a comparison of ampicillin prophylaxis vs a placebo. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1985;187:825-827.
    1. Vasseur PB, Levy J, Dowd E, et al. Surgical wound infection rates in dogs and cats. Data from a teaching hospital. Vet Surg. 1988;17:60-64.
    1. Weese JS. A review of post-operative infections in veterinary orthopaedic surgery. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2008;21:99-105.
    1. Garcia Stickney DN, Thieman Mankin KM. The impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical site infection diagnosis. Vet Surg. 2018;47:66-73.
    1. Misteli H, Weber WP, Reck S, et al. Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection. Arch Surg. 2009;144:553-558.

LinkOut - more resources