Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;34(7):621-624.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01699-7. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

Lessons learned in the practice of community-based participatory research with community partner collaboration in study design and implementation: the community scientist model

Affiliations

Lessons learned in the practice of community-based participatory research with community partner collaboration in study design and implementation: the community scientist model

Megan A Morrell et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Engagement of community participation is an innovative driver of modern research. However, to benefit the communities being studied, it is imperative to continuously evaluate ethical considerations, the relationship dynamic between researchers and community members, and the responsiveness of research teams to the needs and preferences of communities. Northwestern University's Center for Health Equity Transformation founded a community scientist program in 2018 that implemented a study using the Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) model. This project is an ongoing study of heavy metal exposure by geographic location in Chicago. Community scientists from various backgrounds, communities, and organizations formed an advisory panel, partnering with the cancer research team. This commentary describes lessons learned in structuring meaningful community involvement and benefit in CBPR, with a focus on three lessons learned that relate to ethics, relationships, and responsiveness. Our findings lay new groundwork for iteratively shaping best practices in CBPR.

Keywords: CBPR; Collaboration; Community; Community-based participatory research; Ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

References

    1. Plumb M, Poole SF, Sarantis H et al. (2019) Development and evaluation of a training program for community-based participatory research in breast cancer. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(22):4310. 10.3390/ijerph16224310 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valente TW, Fujimoto K, Palmer P, Tanjasiri SP (2010) A network assessment of community-based participatory research: linking communities and universities to reduce cancer disparities. Am J Public Health 100:1319–1325. 10.2105/ajph.009.171116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adebayo N, Dunne W, Dean JR, O’Brian C, Dahdouh R, Simon MA (2023) Tackling gynecologic cancer disparities: an assessment of 2 interventions for improving information exchange with racial/ethnic communities. Clin Obstet Gynecol 66:43–52 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gallicchio VS, Harper J (2021) Role of heavy metals in the incidence of human cancers. In: Khaled NM, Hongbo Z (eds) Heavy metals. IntechOpen, Rijeka
    1. Green G, Johns T (2019) Exploring the relationship (and power dynamic) between researchers and public partners working together in applied health research teams. Front Sociol 4:20. 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources