A Systematic Evaluation of Cost-Saving Dosing Regimens for Therapeutic Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Lung Cancer
- PMID: 37081309
- PMCID: PMC10192147
- DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-00958-6
A Systematic Evaluation of Cost-Saving Dosing Regimens for Therapeutic Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Lung Cancer
Abstract
Background: Expensive novel anticancer drugs put a serious strain on healthcare budgets, and the associated drug expenses limit access to life-saving treatments worldwide.
Objective: We aimed to develop alternative dosing regimens to reduce drug expenses.
Methods: We developed alternative dosing regimens for the following monoclonal antibodies used for the treatment of lung cancer: amivantamab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ramucirumab; and for the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan. The alternative dosing regimens were developed by means of modeling and simulation based on the population pharmacokinetic models developed by the license holders. They were based on weight bands and the administration of complete vials to limit drug wastage. The resulting dosing regimens were developed to comply with criteria used by regulatory authorities for in silico dose development.
Results: We found that alternative dosing regimens could result in cost savings that range from 11 to 28%, and lead to equivalent pharmacokinetic exposure with no relevant increases in variability in exposure.
Conclusions: Dosing regimens based on weight bands and the use of complete vials to reduce drug wastage result in less expenses while maintaining equivalent exposure. The level of evidence of our proposal is the same as accepted by regulatory authorities for the approval of alternative dosing regimens of other monoclonal antibodies in oncology. The proposed alternative dosing regimens can, therefore, be directly implemented in clinical practice.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Rob ter Heine has received fees or funding from Stichting Treatmeds and Amgen. Anthonie van der Wekken has received fees or funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer Roche, Takeda, Janssen Cilag, Lilly, and Merck. Michel van den Heuvel has received fees or funding from Amgen, Astrazeneca, BMS, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Stichting Treatmeds, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pamgene, Pfizer, Roche, Roche diagnostics, Abbvie, Astrazeneca, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Daphne Dumoulin has received funding from Roche, BMS, MSD, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, and Pfizer. Cor van der Leest has received fees or funding from BMS and MSD en Janssen. Lizza Hendriks has received fees or funding from Roche Genentech, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Merck, Pfizer, Benecke, Medtalks, VJOncology, high5oncology, BMS, Eli Lilly, Takeda, MSD, Merck, Novartis, Amgen, and Janssen. Sander Croes, Robin van Geel, Frank Jansman, Rogier Boshuizen, Egbert Smit, Arthur Smit, Thijs Oude Munnink, Hieronymus Derijks, Jeroen Hendrikx, Dirk Jan Moes, and Nikki de Rouw have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical