Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):382.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09392-w.

Effectiveness of a screening tool to assess prevention and rehabilitation needs of 45 to 59 years old in primary care - study protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PReHa45)

Jennifer Marie Burchardi  1 , Karla Spyra  2 , Martin Brünger  2
Affiliations

Effectiveness of a screening tool to assess prevention and rehabilitation needs of 45 to 59 years old in primary care - study protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PReHa45)

Jennifer Marie Burchardi et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: For years it has been stated that the need for prevention and rehabilitation is not always identified early enough. Although many individuals have regular contact with a general practitioner (GP), this access path for applying for a prevention or rehabilitation service has not been fully exploited. The important role of GPs in supporting the intention to apply is highlighted in the research. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the "check-up 45 + " to support GPs both in identifying the need for prevention and rehabilitation services and in submitting applications.

Methods: The study is designed as a two-arm, pragmatic 1:1 randomised controlled study (RCT), which will be conducted in about 20 general practices in the German states of Berlin and Brandenburg. Patients (n = 1,654) aged from 45 to 59 years will be recruited by medical assistants. In addition to usual care, both study groups will receive a questionnaire covering socio-economic and occupational variables to be filled out immediately in the waiting room. The intervention group passes through the "check-up 45 + ". This includes the completion of the "screening 45 + " that aims to assess the need for prevention and rehabilitation services. Medical assistants will immediately evaluate this 2-page screening tool. If a need is identified and confirmed by the GP, information and application documents will be handed over. Moreover, the application process for rehabilitation services is simplified. Primary outcome is the proportion of applications for prevention or rehabilitation services financed by the German Pension Insurance. Administrative data will be provided for this purpose. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of approved applications and completed services. In addition, the proportion of persons with a need for prevention or rehabilitation according to the "check-up 45 + " will be examined. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted and content-analysed to determine the practicability and acceptance of the "check-up 45 + " by the relevant stakeholders.

Discussion: Prevention and rehabilitation need is insufficiently identified and addressed so far. This study will determine the effectiveness of the "check-up 45 + " in primary care.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028303, 03.03.2022).

Keywords: Access barriers; General practice; General practitioners; Preventive health services; Primary health care; Randomized controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SPIRIT flow diagram of the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT flow diagram of the study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Feißel A, Swart E, March S. Health of older workers. Results of the baseline survey from the lidA study. Zentralbl Arbeitsmed Arbeitsschutz Ergon. 2016;66(3):129–36. doi: 10.1007/s40664-015-0055-7. - DOI
    1. Hasselhorn HM, Ebener M. Die differenzierte Rolle von Gesundheit für die Erwerbsteilhabe im höheren Erwerbsalter – eine Diskussion anhand des „lidA-Denkmodells zu Arbeit, Alter und Erwerbsteilhabe“. In: Hohnerlein E, Hennion S, Kaufmann O, editors. Erwerbsverlauf und sozialer Schutz in Europa. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2018. pp. 215–223.
    1. Mittag O, Reese C, Meffert C. (Keine) Reha vor Rente: Analyse der Zugänge zur Erwerbsminderungsrente 2005–2009. WSI-Mitteilungen. 2014;67(2):149–155. doi: 10.5771/0342-300X-2014-2-149. - DOI
    1. Roski C, Romppel M, Grande G. Risk factors for disability pensioning caused by mental disorders - a systematic review. Gesundheitswesen. 2017;79(6):472–483. - PubMed
    1. Bethge M, Spanier K, Köhn S, Schlumbohm A. Self-reported work ability predicts health-related exit and absence from work, work participation, and death: longitudinal findings from a sample of German employees. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(4):591–599. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01608-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources