Optometrists' attitudes toward using OCT angiography lag behind other retinal imaging types
- PMID: 37082888
- DOI: 10.1111/opo.13149
Optometrists' attitudes toward using OCT angiography lag behind other retinal imaging types
Abstract
Purpose: While optometrists' attitudes toward established retinal imaging types are generally positive, they are unknown for optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). We performed a cross-sectional survey to estimate attitudes toward OCTA and identify clinician and/or practice characteristics that influence them.
Methods: A paper-based survey was mailed to 252 randomly selected optometrists in Australia. Five-point Likert-scale items from a previous survey assessing attitudes toward new technology were included to probe respondent characteristics and attitudes toward retinal imaging. Performance expectancy attitudes toward OCTA were elicited by the statement 'I believe OCTA is useful in daily practice'. Mean scores out of five (mean [SD]) were rounded and mapped to appropriate descriptive statements.
Results: The response rate was 47% (118/252). The mean (SD) age of respondents was 44.0 (13.8) years and 50.8% (60/118) were female. Optometrists had 19.9 (14.0) years of clinical experience and 66.9% (79/118) worked at independent practices. In total, 8.5% (10/118) of respondents used OCTA to provide clinical care. Optometrists agreed that optical coherence tomography (OCT), colour fundus imaging, ultra-wide field imaging and fundus autofluorescence (mean scores 3.6-4.7 out of 5) were useful in daily practice but felt neutral about whether OCTA was useful (3.4 [0.8]). Optometrists believed that OCTA was less enjoyable to use (p < 0.0001), less endorsed by peers (p < 0.0001) and felt less confident that they had the knowledge to interpret OCTA (p < 0.0001) compared to other retinal imaging types.
Conclusions: Optometrists are undecided on whether OCTA is useful in daily practice and had lower expectations that using OCTA would confer job performance benefits compared to other retinal imaging types. Further work is needed to advocate the benefits of using OCTA across the profession.
Keywords: angiography; attitudes; diagnostic imaging; optical coherence tomography; optometry; primary health care; surveys and questionnaires.
© 2023 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.
Similar articles
-
Attitudes of optometrists towards artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of retinal disease: A cross-sectional mail-out survey.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Nov;42(6):1170-1179. doi: 10.1111/opo.13034. Epub 2022 Aug 4. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022. PMID: 35924658 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of optical coherence tomography on diagnostic decision-making by UK community optometrists: a clinical vignette study.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 May;39(3):205-215. doi: 10.1111/opo.12613. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019. PMID: 30994199 Free PMC article.
-
An overview of optometrists' diabetic retinopathy practice patterns - a cross-sectional survey.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Jul;41(4):885-895. doi: 10.1111/opo.12798. Epub 2021 Mar 8. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021. PMID: 33682935
-
The application of optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal diseases.Surv Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov-Dec;62(6):838-866. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 1. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28579550 Review.
-
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Glaucoma Care.Curr Eye Res. 2018 Sep;43(9):1067-1082. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1475013. Epub 2018 May 23. Curr Eye Res. 2018. PMID: 29757019 Review.
Cited by
-
High risk does not guarantee high accuracy-Evaluating the prognostic accuracy of OCT biomarkers for predicting late AMD.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025 Sep;45(6):1293-1301. doi: 10.1111/opo.13547. Epub 2025 Jun 25. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025. PMID: 40557781 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the clinical relevance and reliability of outer retinal band length on optical coherence tomography in retinal disease: a cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 12;13(12):e077874. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077874. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 38086596 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Burton MJ, Ramke J, Marques AP, Bourne RR, Congdon N, Jones I, et al. The Lancet global health commission on global eye health: vision beyond 2020. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9:489-551.
-
- Finger RP, Wickremasinghe SS, Baird PN, Guymer RH. Predictors of anti-VEGF treatment response in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.03.009
-
- Ting DSW, Cheung GCM, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy: global prevalence, major risk factors, screening practices and public health challenges: a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2016;44:260-77.
-
- Sloan FA, Hanrahan BW. The effects of technological advances on outcomes for elderly persons with exudative age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:456-63.
-
- Shneor E, Isaacson M, Gordon-Shaag A. The number of optometrists is inversely correlated with blindness in OECD countries. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41:198-201.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources