A novel assessment of participation and executive functions (A-PEX) for traumatic brain injury: a validity study
- PMID: 37083100
- PMCID: PMC10272933
- DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07868-1
A novel assessment of participation and executive functions (A-PEX) for traumatic brain injury: a validity study
Abstract
Background: Executive function deficits are a main cause of participation restrictions post-traumatic brain injury (TBI). Assessing executive functions through actual daily participation may provide valuable information for treatment planning and progress.
Aim: This study aimed to validate the Assessment of Participation and Executive Functions (A-PEX), a tool for evaluating executive function deficits through actual participation in the inpatient rehabilitation context during the subacute phase following TBI.
Design: A cross-sectional with a longitudinal component.
Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation facility.
Population: This study included 56 participants divided into two groups: 30 with orthopedic or spinal cord injuries and 26 with TBI.
Methods: Internal consistency was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was assessed using interclass correlation coefficients. Known-group construct validity was examined by comparing the A-PEX scores between the two groups, and A-PEX convergent construct validity for patients with TBI was examined using correlations between scores on the A-PEX, Multiple Errands Test-hospital version (MET-HV), and Color Trail Test (CTT).
Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the A-PEX domains ranged between 0.83 and 0.96, indicating good-to-excellent internal consistency. Interclass correlations calculated for the control group indicated moderate test-retest reliability for most A-PEX components. Participants with TBI scored significantly lower than those with orthopedic or spinal cord injury for all A-PEX components (P<0.001). Within the TBI group, significant moderate-to-strong correlations were found between all A-PEX components and the MET-HV (0.52<r<0.73, P<0.05) and between the A-PEX executive function scales and the CTT (r=0.52, P<0.05).
Conclusions: The findings provide evidence for the initial reliability and validity of the A-PEX as a measure of post-TBI executive functions.
Clinical rehabilitation impact: By evaluating actual everyday participation, the A-PEX provides valuable clinical insight into the interrelationship between executive functions and participation in the post-TBI subacute phase.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Profiles of executive functioning following traumatic brain injury and stroke using the assessment of participation and executive functions: combined cross-sectional and longitudinal designs.J Rehabil Med. 2024 Jan 18;56:jrm12427. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.12427. J Rehabil Med. 2024. PMID: 38235968 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of Intervention of Participation and Executive Functions (I-PEX) for Adults Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Preliminary Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024 Apr;38(4):279-290. doi: 10.1177/15459683241231529. Epub 2024 Feb 20. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024. PMID: 38375580 Clinical Trial.
-
Establishing the Validity of the Internet-Based Bill-Paying Task to Assess Executive Function Deficits Among Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.Am J Occup Ther. 2022 Jul 1;76(4):7604205110. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2022.047266. Am J Occup Ther. 2022. PMID: 35727641 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement properties of the Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life (TBI-QoL) and Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life (SCI-QoL) measurement systems: a systematic review.Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 21;14(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02722-x. Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 39838501 Free PMC article.
-
Factor structure of the Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool (BAST) in traumatic brain injury.Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jan;42(2):255-260. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1496487. Epub 2018 Nov 17. Disabil Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 30451025
Cited by
-
Profiles of executive functioning following traumatic brain injury and stroke using the assessment of participation and executive functions: combined cross-sectional and longitudinal designs.J Rehabil Med. 2024 Jan 18;56:jrm12427. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.12427. J Rehabil Med. 2024. PMID: 38235968 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brazinova A, Rehorcikova V, Taylor MS, Buckova V, Majdan M, Psota M, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe: a living systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2021;38:1411–40. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.1089/neu.2015.4126 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Report to Congress on traumatic brain injury in the United States: epidemiology and rehabilitation. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention; 2015.
-
- Jourdan C, Bayen E, Pradat-Diehl P, Ghout I, Darnoux E, Azerad S, et al. A comprehensive picture of 4-year outcome of severe brain injuries. Results from the PariS-TBI study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2016;59:100–6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.10.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:986–995.e1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.032 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:728–41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70164-9 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous