Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 21:12:e41627.
doi: 10.2196/41627.

Indigenous Food Systems Changes and Resiliency: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Hiliary Monteith  1 , Elizabeth Claire Hiscock  2   3 , Yasamin Sadeghi  3 , Emily V Smith  4 , Angela Mashford-Pringle  3   5
Affiliations

Indigenous Food Systems Changes and Resiliency: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Hiliary Monteith et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Indigenous food systems (IFS) consider the complex relationships and connections between land, animals, plants, water, and people. These food systems may differ between regions, Indigenous cultures, and history; however, given the similar colonial histories and policies influencing Indigenous groups in Canada, the United States, Australia, and Aotearoa (New Zealand), the IFS changes and responses in these regions may follow similar trends. Climate change and pollution continue to impact the environment in catastrophic ways, and this, in turn, impacts IFS. However, to date, there has been no review of the literature on IFS, how they are changing, and how communities are responding to these changes.

Objective: In this scoping review, we will summarize primary research in Canada, the United States, Australia, and Aotearoa related to IFS addressing the following questions: (1) What changes are IFS experiencing in the context of climate change and pollution? (2) What actions have been taken in response to IFS changes? (3) What are the characteristics of IFS research in peer-reviewed academic literature?

Methods: We will use the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for scoping reviews and the Joanna Briggs Institute reviewer's manual to inform the review process. MEDLINE, SCOPUS, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Sociological Abstracts, and the Bibliography of Native North Americans are the databases included in this review search. All screening and extraction have been supported by Covidence software (Veritas Health Innovation) with 2 independent reviewers conducting the abstract and full-text screening. We will map concepts and themes related to the research questions to contribute to the understanding of IFS within the academic literature and provide a narrative review of the outcomes.

Results: The electronic database searches for this review were conducted in May 2021. Screening and full-text review were initially completed in the winter of 2022. We are currently in the process of compiling results and aim to share findings in 2023.

Conclusions: This review will provide valuable insight into current IFS needs by summarizing the peer-reviewed literature on how IFS are changing because of climate change and pollution and how communities are responding to these changes. The results of this review will be shared with Indigenous communities, through academic publications, community conversations, and conference presentations.

Trial registration: OSF Registries osf.io/xrj87; https://osf.io/xrj87.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR1-10.2196/41627.

Keywords: Indigenous; Indigenous health; climate change; colonization; environment; food systems; pollution; scoping review; traditional foods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Robidoux MA, Mason CW, editors. A Land Not Forgotten: Indigenous Food Security and Land-Based Practices in Northern Ontario (1st ed) Winnipeg, Manitoba: University of Manitoba Press; 2017.
    1. Smylie J, Crengle S, Freemantle J, Taualii M. Indigenous birth outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States - an overview. Open Womens Health J. 2010;(4):7–17. doi: 10.2174/1874291201004010007. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23390467 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson I, Crengle S, Kamaka ML, Chen TH, Palafox N, Jackson-Pulver L. Indigenous health in Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific. Lancet. 2006;367(9524):1775–1785. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68773-4.S0140-6736(06)68773-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. LeBlanc J, Burnett K. What happened to indigenous food sovereignty in Northern Ontario?: imposed political, economic, socio-ecological, and cultural changes. In: Robidoux MA, Mason CW, editors. A Land Not Forgotten: Indigenous Food Security and Land-Based Practices in Northern Ontario. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press; 2017. p. 16.
    1. Tarasuk V, Mitchell A. PROOF. Toronto: 2020. [2023-03-31]. Household food insecurity in Canada-2017-2018. https://proof.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Household-Food-Inse... .

LinkOut - more resources