Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230488.
doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0488.

Association Between a Capitated, Low-cost, County-Based Public Health Insurance Option and Affordable Care Act Premium Growth in California

Arjun Teotia  1 , Daniel R Arnold  1 , Richard M Scheffler  1   2
Affiliations

Association Between a Capitated, Low-cost, County-Based Public Health Insurance Option and Affordable Care Act Premium Growth in California

Arjun Teotia et al. JAMA Health Forum. .

Abstract

Importance: Empirical evidence is needed on how a capitated, risk-based county plan performs as a viable public option in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace in California.

Objective: To estimate whether LA Care-a capitated, county-based public option and California's largest public insurer-was associated with health insurance premium growth in the Los Angeles (LA) regions of Covered California (CC), the ACA exchange in California.

Design, setting, and participants: This economic evaluation used ACA silver plan premium data within the 19 CC regions. Difference-in-differences and event study models used data on plan-level premiums from Health Insurance Exchange Compare for years 2014 to 2022 to estimate the association between LA Care and ACA premium growth in LA.

Exposures: The intervention was LA Care becoming the lowest-cost health plan on the ACA exchange in 2018. The treatment group included the East and West LA regions, and the control group included the remaining 17 CC regions.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome variable was annual premium growth of plans on CC from 2014 to 2022.

Results: Using 504 plan-level observations for 2014 to 2022, ACA premium growth in LA declined by 4.8% after LA Care became the lowest-cost health plan on the exchange in 2018 (coefficient estimate, -0.048; SE, 0.022; 95% CI, -0.093 to -0.002). Savings due to lower premium growth from 2019 to 2022 were calculated to be $345 million, with approximately 70% of the savings ($242 million) going to the federal government.

Conclusions and relevance: In this economic evaluation, LA Care was associated with lower premium growth of other health insurance plans in the LA regions of CC, with the majority of savings going to the federal government. California could have captured these savings if it had applied for and received a State Innovation Waiver under section 1332 of the ACA. LA Care may be a viable public option with the potential to be expanded across California through the state's 16 other county-based health plans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Premiums and Enrollment in Los Angeles (LA), 2014-2022
Data are from Health Insurance Exchange Compare and Covered California.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Event Study of the Association Between LA Care and Affordable Care Act Premium Growth
Data are from Health Insurance Exchange Compare and Covered California. The shaded region shows 95% CIs. Event year 0 = 2019.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. California’s health benefit exchange. Covered California . Accessed October 1, 2022. https://hbex.coveredca.com/data-research/
    1. Weinberg M, Kallerman P. A Study of Affordable Care Act Competitiveness in California. Bay Area Council Economic Institute ; 2017. Accessed October 1, 2022. http://www.bayareaeconomy.org/files/pdf/CA_ACA_Report221017.pdf
    1. Quality ratings. Covered California . Accessed November 20, 2022. https://coveredca.com/support/getting-started/quality-ratings/
    1. Dafny L, Gruber J, Ody C. More insurers lower premiums: evidence from initial pricing in the health insurance marketplaces. Am J Health Econ. 2015;1(1):53-81. doi:10.1162/ajhe_a_00003 - DOI
    1. Lissenden B. Three’s a crowd? the effect of insurer participation on premiums and cost-sharing parameters in the initial years of the ACA Marketplaces. Am J Health Econ. 2017;3(4):477-506. doi:10.1162/ajhe_a_00085 - DOI

Publication types