Minimally Invasive Navigation-Guided Quad Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Comparative In Vitro Study
- PMID: 37083908
- DOI: 10.11607/jomi.10043
Minimally Invasive Navigation-Guided Quad Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Comparative In Vitro Study
Abstract
Purpose: Zygomatic implants (ZIs) have been considered a reliable alternative treatment for patients with maxillary atrophy and/or maxillary defects. The use of a navigation system for assisting ZI placement could be a reliable approach for enhancing accuracy and safety. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new dynamic surgical navigation system with its minimally invasive registration guide for quad zygomatic implant placement in comparison with a gold standard navigation approach. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 zygomatic implants were placed in 10 3D-printed models based on the CBCT scans of edentulous patients. For registration, a surgical registration guide with a quick response plate was used for the test group, and five hemispheric cavities as registered miniscrews in the intraoral area were used for the control group. In each model, a split-mouth approach was employed (two ZIs in bilateral zygomata) to test both systems. After ZI placement, a CBCT scan was performed and merged with pre-interventional planning. The deviations between planned and placed implants were calculated as offset basis, offset apical, and angular deviation and compared between the systems. Results: The offset basis, offset apical, and angular deviation were 1.43 ± 0.55 mm, 1.81 ± 0.68 mm, and 2.32 ± 1.59 degrees in the test group, respectively. For the control group, values of 1.48 ± 0.57 mm, 1.76 ± 0.62 mm, and 2.57 ± 1.51 degrees were measured without significant differences between groups (all P < .05). The accuracy of ZI positions (anterior and posterior) were measured without significant differences between groups. Conclusion: Two navigation systems with different registration techniques seem to achieve comparable acceptable accuracy for dynamic navigation of zygomatic implant placement. With the test group system, additional pre-interventional radiologic imaging and invasive fiducial marker insertion could be avoided.
Similar articles
-
The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 21;12(16):5418. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165418. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37629460 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Combined static and dynamic computer-guided surgery for prosthetically driven zygomatic implant placement.J Dent. 2025 Jan;152:105453. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105453. Epub 2024 Nov 12. J Dent. 2025. PMID: 39537011
-
Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 15;23(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02856-9. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 36918837 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study.J Dent. 2024 Nov;150:105329. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105329. Epub 2024 Sep 5. J Dent. 2024. PMID: 39243803
-
Guided and Navigation Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 May-Jun;38(suppl):7-15. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10465. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023. PMID: 37436945
Cited by
-
The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 21;12(16):5418. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165418. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37629460 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the Accuracy, Surgical Time, and Learning Curve of Freehand, Static, and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery in an In Vitro Study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 May;36(5):555-565. doi: 10.1111/clr.14403. Epub 2025 Jan 21. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025. PMID: 39835464 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources