Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 17;38(5):631-647.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad021.

Political economy analysis of subnational health management in Kenya, Malawi and Uganda

Affiliations

Political economy analysis of subnational health management in Kenya, Malawi and Uganda

Daniela C Rodríguez et al. Health Policy Plan. .

Abstract

The need to bolster primary health care (PHC) to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets for health is well recognized. In Eastern and Southern Africa, where governments have progressively decentralized health decision-making, health management is critical to PHC performance. While investments in health management capacity are important, so is improving the environment in which managers operate. Governance arrangements, management systems and power dynamics of actors can have a significant influence on health managers' ability to improve PHC access and quality. We conducted a problem-driven political economy analysis (PEA) in Kenya, Malawi and Uganda to explore local decision-making environments and how they affect management and governance practices for health. This PEA used document review and key informant interviews (N = 112) with government actors, development partners and civil societies in three districts or counties in each country (N = 9). We found that while decentralization should improve PHC by supporting better decisions in line with local priorities from community input, it has been accompanied by thick bureaucracy, path-dependent and underfunded budgets that result in trade-offs and unfulfilled plans, management support systems that are less aligned to local priorities, weak accountability between local government and development partners, uneven community engagement and insufficient public administration capacity to negotiate these challenges. Emergent findings suggest that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) not only resulted in greater pressures on health teams and budgets but also improved relations with central government related to better communication and flexible funding, offering some lessons. Without addressing the disconnection between the vision for decentralization and the reality of health managers mired in unhelpful processes and politics, delivering on PHC and universal health coverage goals and the SDG agenda will remain out of reach.

Keywords: Kenya; Malawi; Political economy; Uganda; decentralization; governance; health systems; management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to report.

Figures

Figure <sc>1</sc>.
Figure 1.
PEA theoretical framework, adapted from Siddiqi et al., (2009)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Data analysis steps

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bossert T. 1998. Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance. Social Science & Medicine 47: 1513–27. - PubMed
    1. Bossert TJ. 2002. Decentralization of health systems in Ghana, Zambia, Uganda and the Philippines: a comparative analysis of decision space. Health Policy and Planning 17: 14–31. - PubMed
    1. Bossert TJ, Mitchell AD. 2011. Health sector decentralization and local decision-making: decision space, institutional capacities and accountability in Pakistan. Social Science & Medicine 72: 39–48. - PubMed
    1. Bulthuis SE, Kok MC, Amon S et al. 2021. How district health decision-making is shaped within decentralised contexts: a qualitative research in Malawi, Uganda and Ghana. Global Public Health 16: 120–35. - PubMed
    1. de Leeuw E, Clavier C, Breton E. 2014. Health policy—why research it and how: health political science. Health Research Policy and Systems 12: 55. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding