Personalized 3D-printed frames to reduce leak from N95 filtering facepiece respirators: A prospective crossover trial in health care workers
- PMID: 37084394
- DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2023.2205471
Personalized 3D-printed frames to reduce leak from N95 filtering facepiece respirators: A prospective crossover trial in health care workers
Abstract
Correctly fitting N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) have become increasingly important in health care throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the hypothesis that personalized 3D-printed frames could improve N95 FFRs quantitative fit test pass rates and test scores in health care workers (HCWs). HCWs were recruited at a tertiary hospital in Adelaide, Australia (ACTRN 12622000388718). A mobile iPhone camera + app was used to produce 3D scans of volunteers' faces, which were then imported into a software program to produce personalized virtual scaffolds suited to each user's face and their unique anatomical features. These virtual scaffolds were printed on a commercially available 3D printer, producing plastic (and then silicone-coated, biocompatible) frames that can be fitted inside existing hospital supply N95 FFR. The primary endpoint was improved pass rates on quantitative fit testing, comparing participants wearing an N95 FFR alone (control 1) with participants wearing the frame + N95 FFR (intervention 1). The secondary endpoint was the fit factor (FF) in these groups, and R-COMFI respirator comfort and tolerability survey scores. N = 66 HCWs were recruited. The use of intervention 1 increased overall fit test pass rates to 62/66 (93.8%), compared to 27/66 (40.9%) for controls. (OR for pFF pass 20.89 (95%CI: 6.77, 64.48, p < 0.001.) Average FF increased, with the use of intervention 1-179.0 (95%CI: 164.3,193.7), compared to 85.2 (95%CI: 70.4,100.0) with control 1. Pass rates and FF were improved with intervention 1 compared to control 1 for all stages of the fit-test: bending, talking, side-to-side, and up-down motion. (p < 0.001 all stages). Tolerability and comfort of the frame were evaluated with the validated R-COMFI respirator comfort score, showing improvement with the frame compared to N95 FFR alone (p = 0.006). Personalized 3D-printed face frames decrease leakage, improve fit testing pass rates and FF, and provide improved comfort compared to the N95 FFR alone. Personalized 3D-printed face frames represent a rapidly scalable new technology to decrease FFR leakage in HCW and potentially the wider population.
Keywords: COVID-19; masks; personal protective equipment (PPE); respirators; respiratory protection.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Fit for Sealed and Loose-Fitting Surgical Masks and N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 May 3;65(4):463-474. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa125. Ann Work Expo Health. 2021. PMID: 33458738 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized crossover study comparing quantitative fit tests between Trident™ and 3M™ Aura™ N95/P2 respirators.Infect Dis Health. 2022 May;27(2):61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 16. Infect Dis Health. 2022. PMID: 34799300 Clinical Trial.
-
Health Care Workers' Comfort Ratings for Elastomeric Half-Mask Respirators Versus N95® Filtering Facepiece Respirators During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Workplace Health Saf. 2024 Jul;72(7):261-272. doi: 10.1177/21650799241238755. Epub 2024 Apr 8. Workplace Health Saf. 2024. PMID: 38587354 Free PMC article.
-
The role of fit testing N95/FFP2/FFP3 masks: a narrative review.Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76(1):91-100. doi: 10.1111/anae.15261. Epub 2020 Sep 15. Anaesthesia. 2021. PMID: 32932556 Review.
-
A systematic review of passing fit testing of the masks and respirators used during the COVID-19 pandemic: Part 1-quantitative fit test procedures.PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293129. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37883443 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical