Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 9;13(6):381-387.
doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad006.

Anticipating adaptation: tracking the impact of planned and unplanned adaptations during the implementation of a complex population-based genomic screening program

Affiliations

Anticipating adaptation: tracking the impact of planned and unplanned adaptations during the implementation of a complex population-based genomic screening program

Caitlin G Allen et al. Transl Behav Med. .

Erratum in

Abstract

In 2021, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) launched In Our DNA SC. This large-scale initiative will screen 100,000 individuals in South Carolina for three preventable hereditary conditions that impact approximately two million people in the USA but often go undetected. In anticipation of inevitable changes to the delivery of this complex initiative, we developed an approach to track and assess the impact of evaluate adaptations made during the pilot phase of program implementation. We used a modified version of the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modification-Enhanced (FRAME) and Adaptations to code adaptations made during the 3-month pilot phase of In Our DNA SC. Adaptations were documented in real-time using a REDCap database. We used segmented linear regression models to independently test three hypotheses about the impact of adaptations on program reach (rate of enrollment in the program, rate of messages viewed) and implementation (rate of samples collected) 7 days pre- and post-adaptation. Effectiveness was assessed using qualitative observations. Ten adaptations occurred during the pilot phase of program implementation. Most adaptations (60%) were designed to increase the number and type of patient contacted (reach). Adaptations were primarily made based on knowledge and experience (40%) or from quality improvement data (30%). Of the three adaptations designed to increase reach, shortening the recruitment message potential patients received significantly increased the average rate of invitations viewed by 7.3% (p = 0.0106). There was no effect of adaptations on implementation (number of DNA samples collected). Qualitative findings support improvement in effectiveness of the intervention after shortening the consent form and short-term positive impact on uptake of the intervention as measured by team member's participation. Our approach to tracking adaptations of In Our DNA SC allowed our team to quantify the utility of modifications, make decisions about pursuing the adaptation, and understand consequences of the change. Streamlining tools for tracking and responding to adaptations can help monitor the incremental impact of interventions to support continued learning and problem solving for complex interventions being delivered in health systems based on real-time data.

Keywords: Adaptations; Implementation science; Precision medicine.

Plain language summary

We tracked adaptations to a large-scale population genetic screening program at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME). We found adaptations during program roll-out that impacted implementation outcomes. Our approach to tracking adaptations for the program allowed us to quantify the utility of modifications, make decision about pursuing changes, and understand consequences of adaptations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Steinka-Fry KT, Tanner-Smith EE, Dakof GA, Henderson C.. Culturally sensitive substance use treatment for racial/ethnic minority youth: A meta-analytic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017; 75:22–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rathod S, Gega L, Degnan A, et al. The current status of culturally adapted mental health interventions: a practice-focused review of meta-analyses. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018; 14:165–178. doi: 10.2147/ndt.S138430. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernal GE, Domenech Rodríguez MM.. Cultural Adaptations: Tools for Evidence-based Practice with Diverse Populations. American Psychological Association; 2012.
    1. McCarthy MS, Ujano-De Motta LL, Nunnery MA, et al. Understanding adaptations in the Veteran Health Administration’s Transitions Nurse Program: refining methodology and pragmatic implications for scale-up. Implementation science: IS. Jul 13 2021; 16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01126-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stirman SW, Miller CJ, Toder K, Calloway A.. Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implementation science: IS. 2013; 8:65. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-65. - DOI - PMC - PubMed