Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Jun 13;100(24):e2454-e2465.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207338. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

Association of the Informant-Reported Memory Decline With Cognitive and Brain Deterioration Through the Alzheimer Clinical Continuum

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Association of the Informant-Reported Memory Decline With Cognitive and Brain Deterioration Through the Alzheimer Clinical Continuum

Elizabeth Kuhn et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Studies are sparse regarding the association between the informant-reported subjective memory decline (informant report) and Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers. This study thus aimed at determining the clinical relevance of the informant report throughout the AD clinical continuum, by assessing its specific relationships with amyloid deposition, cognition, and neurodegeneration.

Methods: Participants from the Imagerie Multimodale de la maladie d'Alzheimer à un stade Précoce (IMAP+) primary cohort and the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) replication cohort were included; all underwent multimodal neuroimaging and neuropsychological assessments. Follow-up data of IMAP+ participants over up to 36 months were also used for longitudinal analyses. The informant report was measured with the Cognitive Difficulties Scale (IMAP+) and Everyday Cognition (ADNI). General linear models were used to assess the cross-sectional associations between the informant report and amyloid-PET, cognitive performances, and neurodegeneration (atrophy and hypometabolism) in Alzheimer signature areas; while longitudinal links were assessed in IMAP+ with linear mixed-effects models.

Results: A total of 110 IMAP+ participants were included, including 32 cognitively unimpaired older individuals (controls, age: 70.91 ± 6.57 years, female: 50%), 25 patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD, 65.88 ± 6.64, 40%), 35 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, 72.49 ± 7.5, 34%), and 18 with Alzheimer-type dementia (AD dementia, 68.17 ± 8.59, 28%). Seven hundred thirty-one ADNI participants were included, including 157 controls (74.21 ± 5.95, 55%), 84 with SCD (72.00 ± 5.41, 63%), 369 with MCI (71.84 ± 7.4, 44%), and 121 with AD dementia (74.29 ± 7.75, 40%). In IMAP+, a higher informant report strongly correlated to greater amyloid-PET, specifically in patients with MCI (β = 0.48, p = 0.003), and to lower cognitive performance in patients with SCD (global cognition, β = -0.41, p = 0.04) and MCI (memory, β = -0.37, p = 0.03). Findings in patients with MCI were replicated in the ADNI (amyloid-PET, β = 0.25, p < 0.001; memory, β = -0.22, p < 0.001) and extended to neurodegeneration in AD signature areas (β = -0.2, p < 0.001). Longitudinal analyses in IMAP+ showed links with global cognitive decline over time in patients with MCI (estimate -0.74, SE 0.26, p = 0.005) and SCD (estimate -0.36, SE 0.26, p = 0.02) where a higher baseline informant report also predicted an increased amyloid-PET over time (estimate 0.008, SE 0.003, p = 0.02).

Discussion: Altogether, our findings suggest that the informant report is particularly relevant in patients with MCI where it strongly relates to higher amyloid-PET, indicative of impairment due to AD.

Trial registration information: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01638949.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

E. Kuhn was funded by the University of Caen Normandy, INSERM, and the Fondation Philippe Chatrier. A. Perrotin, R. La Joie, E. Touron, S. Dautricourt, M. Vanhoutte, D. Vivien, and V. de La Sayette report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. G. Chételat has received research support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement number 667696), Fondation d'entreprise MMA des Entrepreneurs du Futur, Fondation Alzheimer, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Région Normandie, Association France Alzheimer et maladies apparentées, Fondation Vaincre Alzheimer, and Fondation Recherche Alzheimer and Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (all to Inserm) and personal fees from Inserm, GE Healthcare, Fondation Alzheimer, and Fondation d'entreprise MMA des Entrepreneurs du Futur. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Relationships at Baseline Between the I-SMD and Amyloid Deposition
Graphs illustrate the results of general linear models for the cross-sectional correlations between the I-SMD w-scores and either the global Florbetapir SUVr across the different stages of the AD clinical continuum (A. punadjusted < 0.05 in purple) or the Florbetapir-PET in the group of patients with MCI (B. Thresholded at p < 0.001 with a cluster-level correction for multiple comparisons; k > 582 voxels; no significant association was found in the other groups). AD = Alzheimer disease; CDS = Cognitive Difficulties Scale Questionnaire; I-SMD = informant-reported subjective memory decline; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; SCD = subjective cognitive decline; SUVr = standardized uptake value ratio.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relationships at Baseline Between the I-SMD and Objective Cognitive or Memory Performances Across the Different Stages of the AD Clinical Continuum
Graphs illustrate the results of general linear models for the correlations between I-SMD w-scores and either global cognition (A. MMSE w-scores) or verbal episodic memory (B. ESR free recall w-scores) at baseline. punadjusted < 0.10 in pink and punadjusted < 0.05 in purple. AD = Alzheimer disease; CDS = Cognitive Difficulties Scale; ESR = Encoding, Storage, and Retrieval; I-SMD = informant-reported subjective memory decline; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; SCD = subjective cognitive decline.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relationships at Baseline Between I-SMD and Amyloid Deposition and Objective Cognitive or Memory Performances Within the ADNI Replication Cohort
Graphs illustrate the results of general linear models for the cross-sectional correlations between the I-SMD w-scores and either the global Florbetapir SUVr across the different stages of the AD clinical continuum (A. punadjusted < 0.05 in purple), the Florbetapir-PET in the group of patients with MCI (B. Thresholded at p < 0.001 with a cluster-level correction for multiple comparisons (red) and at pFWE < 0.05 with a k > 200 voxels (orange); no significant association was found in the other groups), global cognition (C. MMSE w-scores), or verbal episodic memory (D. RAVLT immediate recall w-scores) at baseline. punadjusted < 0.10 in pink and punadjusted < 0.05 in purple. AD = Alzheimer disease; ADNI = Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; CDS = Cognitive Difficulties Scale; ECog = Everyday Cognition Questionnaire; I-SMD = informant-reported subjective memory decline; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; RAVLT = Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; SCD = subjective cognitive decline; SUVr = standardized uptake value ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Relationships at Baseline Between I-SMD and Glucose Metabolism and Gray Matter Volume in Alzheimer Signature Areas Within the ADNI Replication Cohort
Graphs illustrate the results of general linear models for the cross-sectional correlations between the I-SMD w-scores and either the glucose metabolism (A) or gray matter volume (B) in Alzheimer signature areas determined in a previous study across the different stages of the AD clinical continuum (punadjusted < 0.05 in purple). Results of the whole-brain voxelwise correlations between the I-SMD score and glucose metabolism and gray matter volume are provided in eFigure 1 and detailed in eTables 3 (IMAP+) and 6 (ADNI) (links.lww.com/WNL/C777). AD = Alzheimer disease; ADNI = Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; FDG = 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; I-SMD = informant-reported subjective memory decline.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M, et al. . A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10(6):844-852. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, Buckley RF, et al. . The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(3):271-278. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ryu SY, Kim A, Kim S, et al. . Self- and informant-reported cognitive functioning and awareness in subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and very mild Alzheimer disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;35(1):91-98. doi:10.1002/gps.5224 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rueda AD, Lau KM, Saito N, et al. . Self-rated and informant-rated everyday function in comparison to objective markers of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(9):1080-1089. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.09.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gifford KA, Liu D, Lu Z, et al. . The source of cognitive complaints predicts diagnostic conversion differentially among nondemented older adults. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10(3):319-327. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data