Application of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for preoperative knowledge of lymphovascular invasion in gastric cancer: a prospective study
- PMID: 37085731
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03920-2
Application of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for preoperative knowledge of lymphovascular invasion in gastric cancer: a prospective study
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the potential of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM) for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in gastric cancer (GC).
Methods: This study prospectively enrolled 90 patients (62 males, 28 females, 60.79 ± 9.99 years old) who received radical gastrostomy. Abdominal MRI examinations including IVIM were performed within 1 week before surgery. Patients were divided into LVI-positive and -negative group according to pathological diagnosis after surgery. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM parameters, including true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), and pseudodiffusion fraction (f), were compared between the two groups. The relationship between MRI parameters and LVI was studied by Spearman's correlation analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to screen independent predictors of LVI. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were applied to evaluate the efficacy.
Results: The ADC, D in LVI-positive group were lower, whereas tumor thickness and f parameter in LVI-positive group were higher than those in LVI-negative group, and they were statistically correlated with LVI (p < 0.05). D, f and tumor thickness were independent risk factors of LVI. The area under the curve of ADC, D, f, thickness, and the combined parameter (D + f + thickness) were 0.667, 0.754, 0.695, 0.792, and 0.876, respectively. The combined parameter demonstrated higher efficacy than any other parameters (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The ADC, D, and f can effectively distinguish LVI status of GC. The D, f and thickness were independent predictors. The combination of the three predictors further improved the efficacy.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04028375.
Keywords: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Lymphovascular invasion; Stomach neoplasms.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cao W, Chen HD, Yu YW et al. (2021) Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020. Chin Med J (Engl) 134:783-791. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Papageorge MV, de Geus SWL, Zheng J et al. (2021) The Discordance of Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 25:1363-1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-04993-4 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI et al. (2020) Gastric cancer. Lancet 396:635-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB et al. (2017) The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 67:93–99. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21388 .
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous