Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 21;24(1):289.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07290-4.

DMC reports in the 21st century: towards better tools for decision-making

Affiliations

DMC reports in the 21st century: towards better tools for decision-making

Marc Vandemeulebroecke et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) have the important task to protect the safety of current and future patients during the conduct of a clinical study. Unfortunately, their work is often made difficult by voluminous DMC reports that are poorly structured and difficult to digest. In this article, we suggest improved solutions. Starting from a principled approach and building upon previous proposals, we offer concrete and easily understood displays, including related computer code. While leveraging modern tools, the most important is that these displays support the DMC's workflow in answering the relevant questions of interest. We hope that the adoption of these proposals can ease the task of DMCs, and importantly, lead to better decision-making for the benefit of patients.

Keywords: DMC report; Good graphical principles; Data Monitoring Committee; Data Safety Monitoring Board; Statistical graphics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. AM, MB, and MV are employees of Novartis. EL is retired from KU Leuven.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Demographics from the Xanomeline study (alternative). Top: Box-whisker plot with a red dot representing the mean of the data, the vertical line is located at the median of the data. The box covers the second and third quartile, while the whiskers extend to the last data point within 1.5 times the interquartile range. Bottom: bar plot of the percentage of female subjects in the respective treatment groups
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Adverse event overview for the Xanomeline study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Adverse event “volcano plot” for the Xanomeline study (Xanomeline High dose vs. Placebo)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Laboratory parameter distribution over time from the Xanomeline study (here: cholesterol). Box-whisker plot with horizontal line representing the median of the data. The box covers the second and third quartile, while the whiskers extend to the last data point within 1.5 times the interquartile range. n_P, number of patients on Placebo; n_X, number of patients on Xanomeline High Dose
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Abnormal laboratory parameter values over time from the Xanomeline study (here: cholesterol). n_P, number of patients on Placebo; n_X, number of patients on Xanomeline High Dose
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Spaghetti plot of creatinine kinase over time. Trajectories that exceed 3 times the upper limit of normal are colored, with annotated subject numbers. Horizontal reference lines can be toggled on for limits of normal if they are the same for every subject (which is not the case for this parameter)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
A graphical alternative to a laboratory shift table. Black lines are limits of normal
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Patient profile. Description of the most relevant clinical information at a glance

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Committee for medicinal products for human use. Guideline on Data Monitoring Committees, 2006 https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-da.... - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for Clinical Trial Sponsors: Establishment and Operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring Committees, 2006. https://www.fda.gov/media/75398/download
    1. Buhr KA, Downs M, Rhorer J, Bechhofer R, Wittes J. Reports to independent data monitoring committees: an appeal for clarity, completeness, and comprehensibility. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018;52(4):459–468. doi: 10.1177/2168479017739268. - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeMets D, Wittes J. Data monitoring committee interim reports: we must get there soon! Clin Trials. 2022;19(1):107–111. doi: 10.1177/17407745211051279. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang W, Revis R, Nilsson M, Crowe B. Clinical trial drug safety assessment with interactive visual analytics. Stat Biopharm Res. 2021;13(3):355–366. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2020.1736142. - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources