Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;78(2):351-361.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

High incidence of type 2 endoleak and low associated adverse events in the Vascular Quality Initiative linked to Medicare claims

Affiliations

High incidence of type 2 endoleak and low associated adverse events in the Vascular Quality Initiative linked to Medicare claims

Neel A Mansukhani et al. J Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Type 2 endoleak (T2EL) is the most common adverse finding on postoperative surveillance after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). A low rate of aneurysm-related mortality with T2EL has been established. However, the optimal management strategy and the efficacy of reintervention remain controversial. This study used data from the Vascular Quality Initiative linked to Medicare claims (VQI-Medicare) to evaluate T2LE in a real-world cohort.

Methods: This retrospective review of EVAR procedures in VQI-Medicare included patients undergoing their first EVAR procedure between 2015 and 2017. Patients with an endoleak other than T2EL on completion angiogram and those without VQI imaging follow-up were excluded. Patients without Medicare part A or part B enrollment at the time of the procedure or without 1-year complete Medicare follow-up data were also excluded. The exposure variable was T2EL, defined as any branch vessel flow detected within the first postoperative year. Outcomes of interest were mortality, reintervention, T2EL-related reintervention, post-EVAR imaging, and T2EL behavior including spontaneous resolution, aneurysm sac regression, and resolution after reintervention. The association of prophylactic branch vessel embolization (PBE) with T2EL resolution and aneurysm sac regression was also evaluated.

Results: In a final cohort of 5534 patients, 1372 (24.7%) had an identified T2EL and 4162 (75.2%) did not. The median age of patients with and without T2EL was 77 and 75 years, respectively. There were no differences in mortality, imaging, reintervention, or T2EL-related reintervention at 3 years after the procedure for patients with T2EL. The aneurysm sac diameter decreased by 4 mm (range: 9-0 mm decrease) in the total cohort. Patients with inferior mesenteric artery-based T2EL had the smallest decrease in aneurysm diameter (median 1 mm decrease compared with 1.5 mm for accessory renal artery-based T2EL, 2 mm for multiple feeding vessel-based T2EL, and 4 mm for lumbar artery-based T2EL; P < .001). Spontaneous resolution occurred in 73.7% of patients (n = 809). T2ELs with evidence of multiple feeding vessels were associated with the lowest rate of spontaneous resolution (n = 51, 54.9%), compared with those with a single identified feeding vessel of inferior mesenteric artery (n = 99, 60.0%), lumbar artery (n = 655, 77.7%), or accessory renal artery (n = 31, 79.5%) (P < .001). PBE was performed in 84 patients. Patients who underwent PBE and were without detectable T2EL after EVAR had the greatest rate of sac regression at follow-up (7 mm decrease) compared with baseline.

Conclusions: T2EL after EVAR is associated with high rates of spontaneous resolution, low rates of aneurysm sac growth, and no evidence of increased early mortality or reintervention. PBE in conjunction with EVAR may be indicated in some circumstances.

Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Endoleak; Endovascular; Minimally invasive therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Derivation of study population. VQI: vascular quality initiative. EVAR: endovascular aneurysm repair. T2EL: type 2 endoleak.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Kaplan-Meier 2-year risk of mortality (A), any re-intervention (B), and re-intervention for type 2 endoleak (C) with 95% confidence intervals. T2EL: type 2 endoleak.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kumar L, Cowled P, Boult M, Howell S, Fitridge R. Type II Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Natural History and Treatment Outcomes. Annals of vascular surgery. 2017;44:94–102. - PubMed
    1. O’Connor PJ, Lookstein RA. Predictive Factors for the Development of Type 2 Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015;32(3):272–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dijkstra ML, Zeebregts CJ, Verhagen HJM, Teijink JAW, Power AH, Bockler D, et al. Incidence, natural course, and outcome of type II endoleaks in infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair based on the ENGAGE registry data. Journal of vascular surgery. 2020;71(3):780–9. - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG, participants Et. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9437):843–8. - PubMed
    1. United Kingdom ETI, Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG, Epstein D, et al. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. The New England journal of medicine. 2010;362(20):1863–71. - PubMed

Publication types