Ultra-processed food consumption and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 37087831
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.03.018
Ultra-processed food consumption and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Ultra-processed foods (UPF) have become a staple of the diet in many countries, concomitant with increases in non-communicable diseases including cancer.
Aim: The aim of this systematic literature review was to evaluate associations between the consumption of UPF and cancer risk.
Methods: A systematic literature search for observational studies investigating the association between cancer risk and UPF consumption, determined by the NOVA classification system, was performed. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Independent review and risk of bias assessment was performed independently by the authors using the National Institutes of Health's Study Quality Assessment Tools.
Results: Eleven reports were identified, including eight retrospective case-control studies and three prospective cohorts. The outcome was risk of total cancer and/or one or more of the following cancers: colorectal, breast, prostate, pancreatic, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and central nervous system tumors. Nine studies reported a significant positive association between UPF intake and all the assessed cancers except prostate, after adjustment for confounding factors including obesity and total energy intake. A 10% increment in the diet's proportion of UPF was associated with increased risk of overall cancer (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.18) and breast cancer (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.21). In addition, a high intake of UPF was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer (ORT3 vs. T1 = 1.30, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.51) and pancreatic cancer (HRQ4 vs. Q1 = 1.49, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.07). More modest associations were found for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and central nervous system tumors. Common limitations of several of the studies included no prior assessment of diet before known diagnosis (the case-control studies), higher participation rates among cases, and likely misclassification of several foods as UPF or non-UPF.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the available suggestive evidence shows a consistent significant association between intake of UPF and the risk of overall and several cancers, including colorectal-, breast- and pancreatic cancer. These data may inform updated dietary guidelines, policy makers and the public towards improving public health.
Keywords: Cancer; Diet; NOVA classification; Nutrition; Tumors; Ultra-processed foods.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest The authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Comments on "Ultra-processed food consumption and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis".Clin Nutr. 2023 Oct;42(10):2086-2087. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Jun 2. Clin Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37301685 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun 1;119(6):1056-1065. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002826. Epub 2024 Apr 8. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38832708
-
Ultra-processed food intake in association with BMI change and risk of overweight and obesity: A prospective analysis of the French NutriNet-Santé cohort.PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 27;17(8):e1003256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003256. eCollection 2020 Aug. PLoS Med. 2020. PMID: 32853224 Free PMC article.
-
The intake of ultra-processed foods, all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study-Health Examinees (KoGES-HEXA) cohort.PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0285314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285314. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37141249 Free PMC article.
-
Consumption of Ultra-Processed Food and Drinks and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the MCC-Spain Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 20;18(10):5457. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105457. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34065213 Free PMC article.
-
The association of ultra-processed food consumption with adult mental health disorders: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 260,385 participants.Nutr Neurosci. 2023 Oct;26(10):913-931. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2022.2110188. Epub 2022 Sep 12. Nutr Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 36094005
Cited by
-
Impact of unhealthy food/drink marketing exposure to children in New Zealand: a systematic narrative review.Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2):daaf021. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf021. Health Promot Int. 2025. PMID: 40177787 Free PMC article.
-
Ultra-processed foods and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 11;12:1631975. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1631975. eCollection 2025. Front Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40717999 Free PMC article.
-
Ultra-Processed Food Intakes and Health Outcomes in Adults Older Than 60 Years: A Systematic Review.Nutr Rev. 2025 Sep 1;83(9):1711-1724. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae223. Nutr Rev. 2025. PMID: 39890099 Free PMC article.
-
Ultra-Processed Food Consumption as a Risk Factor for Gastrointestinal Cancer and Other Causes of Mortality in Southern Italy: A Competing Risk Approach.Nutrients. 2024 Jun 23;16(13):1994. doi: 10.3390/nu16131994. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 38999742 Free PMC article.
-
Complementarity between the updated version of the front-of-pack nutrition label Nutri-Score and the food-processing NOVA classification.Public Health Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;27(1):e63. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000296. Public Health Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38297466 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical