Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 5:10:997116.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.997116. eCollection 2023.

Efficacy and safety of Tuina (Chinese Therapeutic Massage) for knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, controlled, and crossover design clinical trial

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of Tuina (Chinese Therapeutic Massage) for knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, controlled, and crossover design clinical trial

Kaoqiang Liu et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a highly prevalent joint disease among the middle-aged and elderly population that can lead to pain, functional impairment, decreased quality of life, and a large number of medical expenses. Physical therapy is one of the main treatment methods for KOA. In China, Tuina has been widely used in the treatment of KOA, but up to now, there is no high-quality medical evidence to support its effectiveness and safety. The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tuina in the treatment of KOA.

Methods: A crossover design clinical trial was performed on 96 patients. The test group and the control group in the trial were allocated randomly in a ratio of 1:1. The test group received Tuina treatment for 4 weeks first and then received health education intervention for another 4 weeks. The control group received health education intervention for 4 weeks first and then received Tuina treatment for another 4 weeks. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) total score was chosen as the primary outcome. The WOMAC pain score, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC daily activity score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were the secondary outcomes. Adverse events during the intervention were collected in both groups.

Results: Compared with the baseline, the WOMAC total score, WOMAC pain score, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC daily activity, and VAS score of patients in both groups were improved significantly at weeks 4 and 8 (p < 0.001). All patients who received Tuina treatment were significantly superior to those who received health education intervention in the WOMAC total score (194.96, 95% CI = 164.94-224.97, P < 0.001), WOMAC pain score (45.96, 95% CI = 35.82-56.09, P < 0.001), WOMAC stiffness (31.42, 95% CI = 26.37-36.46, P < 0.001), WOMAC daily activity (117.58, 95% CI = 97.56-137.61, P < 0.001), and VAS score (1.07, 95% CI = 0.83-1.32, P < 0.001). Both groups had no serious adverse events during the treatment.

Conclusion: This trial demonstrated that Tuina can reduce joint pain in patients with KOA and improve the physical functions of the knee joint effectively and safely.

Clinical trial registration: This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR-TTRCC-13003157). http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=6402.

Keywords: Tuina; WOMAC; clinical trial; crossover design; knee osteoarthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of participant screening and randomization.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in primary outcomes over an 8-week study period between the test group and control group. (A) WOMAC total score, (B) WOMAC pain score, (C) WOMAC stiffness score, (D) WOMAC daily activity score, and (E) VAS score. ***Significant difference from 4-week group vs. baseline and 8-week group vs. 4 weeks.

References

    1. Felson DT. Clinical practice: osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. (2006) 354:841–8. 10.1056/NEJMcp051726 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, et al. . OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Part II OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthrit Cartil. (2008) 16:137–62. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. (2003) 81:646–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fransen M, Bridgett L, March L, Hoy D, Penserga E, Brooks P. The epidemiology of osteoarthritis in Asia. Int J Rheum Dis. (2011) 14:113–21. 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01608.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang B, Xing D, Dong SJ, Tie RX, Zhang ZQ, Lin JH, et al. . A systematic review of the epidemiology and disease burden of knee osteoarthritis in China. Chin J Evid Based Med. (2018) 18:134–42. 10.7507/1672-2531.201712031 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources