Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 19;9(5):e1476.
doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001476. eCollection 2023 May.

The Association Between Kidney Donor Profile Index and 1-y Graft Function

Affiliations

The Association Between Kidney Donor Profile Index and 1-y Graft Function

Renato Demarchi Foresto et al. Transplant Direct. .

Abstract

The association between Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and 1-y estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with long-term kidney graft survival is well known. Yet, the association between KDPI and 1-y eGFR remains uncertain considering the several concurrent competing risk factors.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 3059 consecutive deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with a 1-y follow-up from January 2013 to December 2017. The aim was to determine the association between the KDPI strata (0%-35%, 36%-50%, 51%-85%, 86%-100%) and 1-y eGFR estimated by the CKD-EPI equation.

Results: The incidence of delayed graft function (50.6% versus 59.3% versus 62.7% versus 62.0%; P < 0.001) and cytomegalovirus infection (36.7% versus 36.6% versus 43.3% versus 57.8%; P < 0.001) increased with increasing KDPI strata but not biopsy-proven acute rejection (9.1% versus 9.8% versus 8.4% versus 9.1%; P = 0.736). The median 1-y eGFR decreased with increasing KDPI strata (64.8 versus 53.5 versus 46.9 versus 39.1 mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.001). In the Cox regression, the higher the KDPI was, the lower the probability of a lower 1-y eGFR was. Assuming the 0%-35% strata as the reference, the likelihood of eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 was increased by 76.6% (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.767, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.406-2.220), 2.24- and 2.87-fold higher for KDPI higher >35%-50% (HR = 2.239, 95% CI = 1.862-2.691), and >51%-85% (HR = 2.871, 95% CI = 2.361-3.491), respectively. Other variables associated with a lower graft function were donor sex (HR male versus female = 0.896, 95% CI = 0.813-0.989) and cold ischemia time (HR for each hour = 1.011, 95% CI = 1.004-1.019). This association was sustained after the Poisson mediation analysis, including delayed graft function, cytomegalovirus, and acute rejection as mediators.

Conclusions: In this cohort of deceased donor kidney recipients, KDPI, and cold ischemia time were the major independent risk factors associated with lower 1-y kidney function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Flowchart of the study cohort. DDKT, deceased donor kidney transplant; KDPI, Kidney Donor Profile Index.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Donor distribution of this study by KDPI and standard/expanded criteria. A, Histogram of the distribution of kidney transplant recipients according to KDPI. B, Distribution of standard vs expanded criteria donors classification by KDPI strata. KDPI, Kidney Donor Profile Index.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Association between KDPI and 1-y eGFR (A), stratified by the presence of DGF (B) and by the CIT (C). Deaths and graft losses were excluded from this analysis. CIT, cold ischemia time; DGF, delayed graft function; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; KDPI, Kidney Donor Profile Index.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Box plots comparing median 1-y eGFR (CKD-EPI) after kidney transplantation according to KDPI strata ([A] P < 0.001), stratified by the presence of DGF ([B] P = 0.015 no DGF vs DGF, KDPI 0%–35%) and by the CIT ([C] P < 0,001, CIT<23 vs >23 h, KDPI 51%–85%). CIT, cold ischemia time; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DGF, delayed graft function; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; EPI, epidemiology; KDPI, Kidney Donor Profile Index.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Kaplan-Meier plots of patient and graft survival categorized by KDPI strata. A, Kaplan-Meier analysis of 1-y patient survival by KDPI strata. B, Kaplan-Meier analysis of 1-y death-censored graft survival by KDPI strata. C, Kaplan-Meier analysis of 1-y graft survival by KDPI strata. The P value was obtained by the log-rank test. KDPI, Kidney Donor Profile Index.

References

    1. Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche H, et al. . Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:589–597. - PubMed
    1. Port FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger RA, et al. . Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation. 2002;74:1281–1286. - PubMed
    1. Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, et al. . A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index. Transplantation. 2009;88:231–236. - PubMed
    1. Dahmen M, Becker F, Pavenstadt H, et al. . Validation of the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) to assess a deceased donor’s kidneys’ outcome in a European cohort. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11234. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee JH, Park WY, Kim YS, et al. . Clinical significance of the kidney donor profile index in deceased donors for prediction of post-transplant clinical outcomes: a multicenter cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0205011. - PMC - PubMed