Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 11:3:26334895221112033.
doi: 10.1177/26334895221112033. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

Accelerating the impact of artificial intelligence in mental healthcare through implementation science

Affiliations

Accelerating the impact of artificial intelligence in mental healthcare through implementation science

Per Nilsen et al. Implement Res Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in mental healthcare offers a potential solution to some of the problems associated with the availability, attractiveness, and accessibility of mental healthcare services. However, there are many knowledge gaps regarding how to implement and best use AI to add value to mental healthcare services, providers, and consumers. The aim of this paper is to identify challenges and opportunities for AI use in mental healthcare and to describe key insights from implementation science of potential relevance to understand and facilitate AI implementation in mental healthcare.

Methods: The paper is based on a selective review of articles concerning AI in mental healthcare and implementation science.

Results: Research in implementation science has established the importance of considering and planning for implementation from the start, the progression of implementation through different stages, and the appreciation of determinants at multiple levels. Determinant frameworks and implementation theories have been developed to understand and explain how different determinants impact on implementation. AI research should explore the relevance of these determinants for AI implementation. Implementation strategies to support AI implementation must address determinants specific to AI implementation in mental health. There might also be a need to develop new theoretical approaches or augment and recontextualize existing ones. Implementation outcomes may have to be adapted to be relevant in an AI implementation context.

Conclusion: Knowledge derived from implementation science could provide an important starting point for research on implementation of AI in mental healthcare. This field has generated many insights and provides a broad range of theories, frameworks, and concepts that are likely relevant for this research. However, when taking advantage of the existing knowledge basis, it is important to also be explorative and study AI implementation in health and mental healthcare as a new phenomenon in its own right since implementing AI may differ in various ways from implementing evidence-based practices in terms of what implementation determinants, strategies, and outcomes are most relevant.Plain Language Summary: The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in mental healthcare offers a potential solution to some of the problems associated with the availability, attractiveness, and accessibility of mental healthcare services. However, there are many knowledge gaps concerning how to implement and best use AI to add value to mental healthcare services, providers, and consumers. This paper is based on a selective review of articles concerning AI in mental healthcare and implementation science, with the aim to identify challenges and opportunities for the use of AI in mental healthcare and describe key insights from implementation science of potential relevance to understand and facilitate AI implementation in mental healthcare. AI offers opportunities for identifying the patients most in need of care or the interventions that might be most appropriate for a given population or individual. AI also offers opportunities for supporting a more reliable diagnosis of psychiatric disorders and ongoing monitoring and tailoring during the course of treatment. However, AI implementation challenges exist at organizational/policy, individual, and technical levels, making it relevant to draw on implementation science knowledge for understanding and facilitating implementation of AI in mental healthcare. Knowledge derived from implementation science could provide an important starting point for research on AI implementation in mental healthcare. This field has generated many insights and provides a broad range of theories, frameworks, and concepts that are likely relevant for this research.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; implementation; mental health services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Aafjes-van Doorn K., Kamsteeg C., Bate J., Aafjes M. (2021). A scoping review of machine learning in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 31(1), 92–116. 10.1080/10503307.2020.1808729 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aarons G. A., Hurlburt M., Horwitz S. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38, 4–23. 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alegría M., Nakash O., NeMoyer A. (2018). Increasing equity in access to mental health care: A critical first step in improving service quality. World Psychiatry, 17(1), 43–44. 10.1002/wps.20486 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett P. M., Steinhubl S. R., Muse E. D., Topol E. (2017). Digital medicine: Digitising the mind. The Lancet, 389, 1877. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31218-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bickman L. (2020). Improving mental health services: A 50-year journey from randomized experiments to artificial intelligence and precision mental health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 47(5), 795–843. 10.1007/s10488-020-01065-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed