Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun:96:102610.
doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2023.102610. Epub 2023 Feb 11.

The association between saving disposition and financial distress: A genetically informed approach

Affiliations

The association between saving disposition and financial distress: A genetically informed approach

Alexandros Giannelis et al. J Econ Psychol. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Saving disposition, the tendency to save rather than consume, has been found to be associated with economic outcomes. People lacking the disposition to save are more likely to experience financial distress. This association could be driven by other economic factors, behavioral traits, or even genetic effects. Using a sample of 3,920 American twins, we develop scales to measure saving disposition and financial distress. We find genetic influences on both traits, but also a large effect of the rearing family environment on saving disposition. We estimate that 44% of the covariance between the two traits is due to genetic effects. Saving disposition remains strongly associated with lower financial distress, even after controlling for family income, cognitive ability, and personality traits. The association persists within families and monozygotic twin pairs; the twin who saves more tends to be the twin who experiences less financial distress. This result suggest that there is a direct association between saving disposition and financial distress, although the direction of causation remains unclear.

Keywords: genetics; income; saving; twins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Correlation matrix. 95% confidence intervals in brackets; all correlations are statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Biometric analysis. The 95% confidence interval is given below each estimate. a2 = proportion of variance that is due to A (additive genetics effects); c2 = proportion of variance that is due to C (common family environment); e2 = proportion of variance that is due to E (unique environment); rg = genetic correlation; rc = common environmental correlation; re = unique environmental correlation.

References

    1. Anderloni L, Bacchiocchi E, & Vandone D (2012). Household financial vulnerability: An empirical analysis. Research in Economics, 66 (3), 284–296. 10.2139/ssrn.1959801 - DOI
    1. Anokhin AP, Golosheykin S, Grant JD, & Heath AC (2011). Heritability of delay discounting in adolescence: A longitudinal twin study. Behavior Genetics, 41 (2), 175–183. 10.1007/s10519-010-9384-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anokhin AP, Grant JD, Mulligan RC, & Heath AC (2015). The genetics of impulsivity: Evidence for the heritability of delay discounting. Biological Psychiatry, 77 (10), 887–894. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.10.022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barth D, Papageorge NW, & Thom K (2020). Genetic endowments and wealth inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 128 (4), 1474–1522. 10.3386/w24642 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp JP, Cesarini D, Johannesson M, Lindqvist E, & Apicella C (2011). On the sources of the height–intelligence correlation: New insights from a bivariate ace model with assortative mating. Behavior Genetics, 41 (2), 242–252. 10.1007/s10519-010-9376-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources