Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;130(10):1275-1285.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17465. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

Choosing blood pressure thresholds to inform pregnancy care in the community: An analysis of cluster trials

Affiliations

Choosing blood pressure thresholds to inform pregnancy care in the community: An analysis of cluster trials

Peter von Dadelszen et al. BJOG. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To inform digital health design by evaluating diagnostic test properties of antenatal blood pressure (BP) outputs and levels to identify women at risk of adverse outcomes.

Design: Planned secondary analysis of cluster randomised trials.

Setting: India, Pakistan, Mozambique.

Population: Women with in-community BP measurements and known pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: Blood pressure was defined by its outputs (systolic and/or diastolic, systolic only, diastolic only or mean arterial pressure [calculated]) and level: normotension-1 (<135/85 mmHg), normotension-2 (135-139/85-89 mmHg), non-severe hypertension (140-149/90-99 mmHg; 150-154/100-104 mmHg; 155-159/105-109 mmHg) and severe hypertension (≥160/110 mmHg). Dose-response (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]) and diagnostic test properties (negative [-LR] and positive [+LR] likelihood ratios) were estimated.

Main outcome measures: Maternal/perinatal composites of mortality/morbidity.

Results: Among 21 069 pregnancies, different BP outputs had similar aRR, -LR, and +LR for adverse outcomes. No BP level (even normotension-1) was associated with low risk (all -LR ≥0.20). Across outcomes, risks rose progressively with higher BP levels above normotension-1. For each of maternal central nervous system events and stillbirth, BP ≥155/105 mmHg showed at least good diagnostic test performance (+LR ≥5.0) and BP ≥135/85 mmHg at least fair performance, similar to BP ≥140/90 mmHg (+LR 2.0-4.99).

Conclusions: In the community, normal BP values do not provide reassurance about subsequent adverse outcomes. Given the similar performance of BP cut-offs of 135/85 and 140/90 mmHg for hypertension, and 155/105 and 160/110 mmHg for severe hypertension, digital decision support for women in the community should consider using these lower thresholds.

Keywords: blood pressure thresholds; community; digital health; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Magee LA, Nicolaides KH, von Dadelszen P. Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(19):1817-32.
    1. Payne BA, Hutcheon JA, Ansermino JM, Hall DR, Bhutta ZA, Bhutta SZ, et al. A risk prediction model for the assessment and triage of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in low-resourced settings: the miniPIERS (pre-eclampsia integrated estimate of RiSk) multi-country prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2014;11(1):e1001589. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001589
    1. Saudan P, Brown MA, Buddle ML, Jones M. Does gestational hypertension become pre-eclampsia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(11):1177-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09971.x
    1. von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, Ansermino JM, Broughton Pipkin F, Cote AM, et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):219-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61351-7
    1. Wen T, Schmidt CN, Sobhani NC, Guglielminotti J, Miller EC, Sutton D, et al. Trends and outcomes for deliveries with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy from 2000 to 2018: a repeated cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2022;129(7):1050-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17038

LinkOut - more resources