Impact of daily use of emollient 'plus' on corticosteroid consumption in patients with atopic dermatitis: An open, randomized controlled study
- PMID: 37092256
- DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18947
Impact of daily use of emollient 'plus' on corticosteroid consumption in patients with atopic dermatitis: An open, randomized controlled study
Abstract
Background: Emollients are the baseline treatment for mild or moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) to improve the epidermal barrier and provide anti-irritant and anti-pruritic effects. Emollient 'plus' can influence the skin microbiome of atopic eczema patients.
Objectives: To evaluate the benefits of using Emollient 'plus' to reduce corticosteroid consumption.
Methods: In an open, single-centre, randomized, controlled study, patients with mild to moderate AD (Severity scoring of AD [SCORAD] score 20-30) were randomized 1:1 to apply the Emollient 'plus' twice daily for 28 days or to continue with their usual classical emollient (Control group). In addition, each patient received topical corticosteroids to use when necessary and according to the dermatologist's prescription. Assessments included SCORAD, PO-SCORAD, local SCORAD, quality of life questionnaires, and tolerability.
Results: A total of 119 patients were included in the PP population with a mean age of 26.50 ± 17.5 years old (min-max 3-71 years). Between baseline and day 28, the mean amount of corticosteroid used was lower for the Emollient 'plus' versus Control group (6.03 vs. 9.16 g; p = 0.041) and corticosteroid was applied on fewer days (37.5% vs. 46.9% of days; p = 0.0256) with fewer applications per day (0.55 vs. 0.71 applications per day; p = 0.0203). Similar improvements were observed in both groups for SCORAD, PO-SCORAD, local SCORAD, skin sensation score, AD burden scale, patient benefit index >1, as well as subject and investigator efficacy and tolerability questionnaire assessments.
Conclusions: Between baseline and day 28, there was significant corticosteroid-sparing in the Emollient 'plus' group compared to the Control group in quantity, number of applications per day and number of days of use, whilst efficacy was maintained with no significant differences between the two groups for all clinical evaluations, as well as for tolerability.
© 2023 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Wollenberg A, Barbarot S, Bieber T, Christen-Zaech S, Deleuran M, Fink-Wagner A, et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(5):657-82.
-
- Hong J, Buddenkotte J, Berger TG, Steinhoff M. Management of itch in atopic dermatitis. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2011;30(2):71-86.
-
- Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, Krol A, Paller AS, Schwarzenberger K, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(1):116-32.
-
- Frølunde AS, Thyssen JP, Deleuran M, Vestergaard C. Appraisal of proactive topical therapy in atopic dermatitis: pros and cons. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22(6):775-83.
-
- Callen J, Chamlin S, Eichenfield LF, Ellis C, Girardi M, Goldfarb M, et al. A systematic review of the safety of topical therapies for atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(2):203-21.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous