The elicitation of affordance depends on conceptual attributes: evidence from a virtual reality study
- PMID: 37093257
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06622-9
The elicitation of affordance depends on conceptual attributes: evidence from a virtual reality study
Abstract
Affordance is a property of object with respect to the observer, which is related to the attributes of the object. In the present study, we examined whether affordance elicitation is primarily based on the conceptual attributes or instance attributes of the object. To distinguish the role of the two types of attributes in elicitation of affordance, we manipulated the size of a pan in virtual reality (Experiment 1). The critical condition is the giant pan, which should elicit manipulability affordance if affordance is concept-based and it should not elicit manipulability affordance if affordance is instance-based. The results support the former assumption, i.e., the elicitation of affordance is concept-based. To confirm the conclusion, we created a water-handled pan in virtual reality and examined its manipulability affordance (Experiment 2). The water-handled pan looks similar to a normal pan, but its handle is composed of flowing water which, in concept, cannot be grasped. Consistent with the concept-based conclusion, the water-handled pan did not elicit manipulability affordance. The present findings provided convergent evidence that ordinary people rely primarily on conceptual attributes of the object to elicit manipulability affordance.
Keywords: Affordance; Conceptual attributes; Instance attributes; Manipulability; Virtual reality.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Eating Russula mushrooms is a matter of semantic knowledge. Comment on "The elicitation of affordance depends on conceptual attributes: evidence from a virtual reality study" by Lai et al. (2023).Exp Brain Res. 2023 Jun;241(6):1459-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06630-9. Epub 2023 May 10. Exp Brain Res. 2023. PMID: 37165079 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Eating Russula mushrooms is a matter of semantic knowledge. Comment on "The elicitation of affordance depends on conceptual attributes: evidence from a virtual reality study" by Lai et al. (2023).Exp Brain Res. 2023 Jun;241(6):1459-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06630-9. Epub 2023 May 10. Exp Brain Res. 2023. PMID: 37165079 No abstract available.
-
Affordance Compatibility Effect for Word Learning in Virtual Reality.Cogn Sci. 2019 Jun;43(6):e12742. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12742. Cogn Sci. 2019. PMID: 31204801
-
When left feels right: asymmetry in the affordance effect.Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S199-202. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0450-3. Cogn Process. 2012. PMID: 22806648
-
Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30117156 Free PMC article.
-
How does virtual reality simulation compare to simulated practice in the acquisition of clinical psychomotor skills for pre-registration student nurses? A systematic review.Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103466. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103466. Epub 2019 Nov 14. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020. PMID: 31783192
Cited by
-
Eating Russula mushrooms is a matter of semantic knowledge. Comment on "The elicitation of affordance depends on conceptual attributes: evidence from a virtual reality study" by Lai et al. (2023).Exp Brain Res. 2023 Jun;241(6):1459-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06630-9. Epub 2023 May 10. Exp Brain Res. 2023. PMID: 37165079 No abstract available.
-
On the functional brain networks involved in tool-related action understanding.Commun Biol. 2023 Nov 14;6(1):1163. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05518-2. Commun Biol. 2023. PMID: 37964121 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alluisi EA, Warm JS (1990) Things that go together: a review of stimulus-response compatibility and related effects. In: Proctor RW, Reeve TG (eds) Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. North-Holland, Oxford, England, pp 3–30
-
- Ambrosini E, Scorolli C, Borghi AM, Costantini M (2012) Which body for embodied cognition? Affordance and language within actual and perceived reaching space. Conscious Cogn 21(3):1551–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Borghi AM (2004) Object concepts and action: Extracting affordances from objects parts. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 115:69–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.004 - DOI
-
- Borghi AM, Flumini A, Cimatti F, Marocco D, Scorolli C (2011) Manipulating objects and telling words: a study on concrete and abstract words acquisition. Front Psychol 2:15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00015 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Buxbaum LJ (2001) Ideomotor apraxia: a call to action. Neurocase 7:445–458. https://doi.org/10.1093/neucas/7.6.445 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources