Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 24:7:e36837.
doi: 10.2196/36837.

An App-Based Intervention for Pediatric Weight Management: Pre-Post Acceptability and Feasibility Trial

Jennifer S Cox  1 , Elanor C Hinton  1 , Julian Hamilton Shield  1 , Natalia S Lawrence  2
Affiliations

An App-Based Intervention for Pediatric Weight Management: Pre-Post Acceptability and Feasibility Trial

Jennifer S Cox et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: A multidisciplinary approach to weight management is offered at tier 3 pediatric weight management services in the United Kingdom. Encouraging dietary change is a major aim, with patients meeting with dieticians, endocrinologists, psychologists, nurse specialists, and social workers on average every other month.

Objective: This research sought to trial an inhibitory control training smartphone app-FoodT-with the clinic population of a pediatric weight management service. FoodT has shown positive impacts on food choice in adult users, with resulting weight loss. It was hoped that when delivered as an adjunctive treatment alongside the extensive social, medical, psychological, and dietetic interventions already offered at the clinic, the introduction of inhibitory control training may offer patients another tool that supports eating choice. In this feasibility trial, recruitment, retention, and app use were the primary outcomes. An extensive battery of measures was included to test the feasibility and acceptability of these measures for future powered trials.

Methods: FoodT was offered to pediatric patients and their parents during a routine clinic appointment, and patients were asked to use the app at home every day for the first week and once per week for the rest of the month. Feasibility and acceptability were measured in terms of recruitment, engagement with the app, and retention to the trial. A battery of psychometric tests was given before and after app use to assess the acceptability of collecting data on changes to food choices and experiences that would inform future trial work.

Results: A total of 12 children and 10 parents consented (22/62, 35% of those approached). Further, 1 child and no parents achieved the recommended training schedule. No participants completed the posttrial measures. The reasons for not wanting to be recruited to the trial included participants not considering their weight to be connected to eating choices and not feeling that the app suited their needs. No reasons are known for noncompletion.

Conclusions: It is unclear whether the intervention itself or the research processes, including the battery of measures, prevented completion. It is therefore difficult to make any decisions as to the value that the app has within this setting. Important lessons have been learned from this research that have potential broad relevance, including the importance of co-designing interventions with service users and avoiding deterring people from early-stage participation in extensive data collection.

Keywords: eHealth; intervention; obesity; pediatric; weight management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow-diagram of recruitment, adherence, and retention.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Veling H, Lawrence NS, Chen Z, van Koningsbruggen GM, Holland RW. What is trained during food go/no-go training? A review focusing on mechanisms and a research agenda. Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4(1):35–41. doi: 10.1007/s40429-017-0131-5. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28357193 131 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawrence NS, O'Sullivan J, Parslow D, Javaid M, Adams RC, Chambers CD, Kos K, Verbruggen F. Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake. Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.009. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0195-6663(15)00296-2 S0195-6663(15)00296-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porter L, Bailey-Jones C, Priudokaite G, Allen S, Wood K, Stiles K, Parvin O, Javaid M, Verbruggen F, Lawrence NS. From cookies to carrots; the effect of inhibitory control training on children's snack selections. Appetite. 2018 May 01;124:111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.010. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0195-6663(17)30136-8 S0195-6663(17)30136-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. FoodT brain training. University of Exeter. [2022-01-25]. https://www.exeter.ac.uk/foodt/
    1. Lawrence NS, Van Beurden S, Javaid M, Mostazir M. Which factors predict the effects of food response inhibition training on food intake and weight? University of Exeter. [2020-07-18]. https://www.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/research/microsites/fo... .

LinkOut - more resources