CNN-based fully automatic wrist cartilage volume quantification in MR images: A comparative analysis between different CNN architectures
- PMID: 37094028
- DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29671
CNN-based fully automatic wrist cartilage volume quantification in MR images: A comparative analysis between different CNN architectures
Abstract
Purpose: Automatic measurement of wrist cartilage volume in MR images.
Methods: We assessed the performance of four manually optimized variants of the U-Net architecture, nnU-Net and Mask R-CNN frameworks for the segmentation of wrist cartilage. The results were compared to those from a patch-based convolutional neural network (CNN) we previously designed. The segmentation quality was assessed on the basis of a comparative analysis with manual segmentation. The best networks were compared using a cross-validation approach on a dataset of 33 3D VIBE images of mostly healthy volunteers. Influence of some image parameters on the segmentation reproducibility was assessed.
Results: The U-Net-based networks outperformed the patch-based CNN in terms of segmentation homogeneity and quality, while Mask R-CNN did not show an acceptable performance. The median 3D DSC value computed with the U-Net_AL (0.817) was significantly larger than DSC values computed with the other networks. In addition, the U-Net_AL provided the lowest mean volume error (17%) and the highest Pearson correlation coefficient (0.765) with respect to the ground truth values. Of interest, the reproducibility computed using U-Net_AL was larger than the reproducibility of the manual segmentation. Moreover, the results indicate that the MRI-based wrist cartilage volume is strongly affected by the image resolution.
Conclusions: U-Net CNN with attention layers provided the best wrist cartilage segmentation performance. In order to be used in clinical conditions, the trained network can be fine-tuned on a dataset representing a group of specific patients. The error of cartilage volume measurement should be assessed independently using a non-MRI method.
Keywords: MRI; arthritis; cartilage; deep learning; segmentation; wrist.
© 2023 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Eckstein F, Burstein D, Link TM. Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis. NMR Biomed. 2006;19:822-854. doi:10.1002/nbm.1063
-
- Li X, Yu A, Virayavanich W, Noworolski SM, Link TM, Imboden J. Quantitative characterization of bone marrow edema pattern in rheumatoid arthritis using 3 tesla MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35:211-217. doi:10.1002/jmri.22803
-
- Aizenberg E, Roex EAH, Nieuwenhuis WP, et al. Automatic quantification of bone marrow edema on MRI of the wrist in patients with early arthritis: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:1127-1134. doi:10.1002/mrm.26712
-
- Liu W, Li H, Hua Y. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of anterior talofibular ligament in lateral chronic ankle instability ankles pre- and postoperatively. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:397. doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1758-z
-
- Xu D, van der Voet J, Hansson NM, et al. Association between meniscal volume and development of knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2021;60:1392-1399. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keaa522
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources