The Relationship Between Face Mask Use and Face-Touching Frequency in Public Areas: Naturalistic Study
- PMID: 37094229
- PMCID: PMC10262021
- DOI: 10.2196/43308
The Relationship Between Face Mask Use and Face-Touching Frequency in Public Areas: Naturalistic Study
Abstract
Background: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, a major public health goal has been reducing the spread of the virus, with particular emphasis on reducing transmission from person to person. Frequent face touching can transmit viral particles from one infected person and subsequently infect others in a public area. This raises an important concern about the use of face masks and their relationship with face-touching behaviors. One concern discussed during the pandemic is that wearing a mask, and different types of masks, could increase face touching because there is a need to remove the mask to smoke, drink, eat, etc. To date, there have been few studies that have assessed this relationship between mask wearing and the frequency of face touching relative to face-touching behaviors.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the frequency of face touching in people wearing a mask versus not wearing a mask in high-foot traffic urban outdoor areas. The purpose of this study was to assess if mask wearing was associated with increased face touching.
Methods: Public webcam videos from 4 different cities in New York, New Jersey, Louisiana, and Florida were used to collect data. Face touches were recorded as pedestrians passed under the webcam. Adult pedestrians wearing masks were compared to those not wearing masks. Quantitative measures of frequency, duration, site of touch, and oral activities were recorded. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the association between mask use and face touching.
Results: Of the 490 observed subjects, 241 (49.2%) were wearing a mask properly and 249 (50.8%) were not. In the unmasked group, 33.7% (84/249) were wearing it improperly, covering the mouth only. Face touching occurred in 11.4% (56/490) of the masked group and 17.6% (88/490) in the unmasked group. Of those who touched their face, 61.1% (88/144) of people were not wearing a mask. The most common site of face touching was the perioral region in both groups. Both the masked and unmasked group had a frequency of face touching for 0.03 touches/s. Oral activities such as eating or smoking increased face touching in the unmasked group.
Conclusions: Contrary to expectations, non-mask-wearing subjects touched their face more frequently than those who were wearing a mask. This finding is substantial because wearing a face mask had a negative association with face touching. When wearing a mask, individuals are less likely to be spreading and ingesting viral particles. Therefore, wearing a mask is more effective in preventing the spread of viral particles.
Keywords: COVID-19; behavior; digital surveillance; face-touching; health; health risk; mask; mask wearing; prevention; public health; risk; self-inoculation; surveillance; transmission; webcam video.
©Sydney Niesen, Daniel Ramon, Rhonda Spencer-Hwang, Ryan Sinclair. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 29.05.2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Face-Touching Behaviors Before and During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016924. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16924. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32725247 Free PMC article.
-
Does wearing a surgical mask influence face touching by healthcare workers? A retrospective cohort study.Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Feb;35(1):120-125. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14082. Epub 2022 Sep 18. Emerg Med Australas. 2023. PMID: 36117397 Free PMC article.
-
Face masks can reduce the frequency of face touching: an observational crossover study.Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Oct;123:54-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.072. Epub 2022 Aug 2. Int J Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35926803
-
A technical review of face mask wearing in preventing respiratory COVID-19 transmission.Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2021 Apr;52:101417. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2021.101417. Epub 2021 Jan 29. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2021. PMID: 33642918 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is wearing a face mask safe for people with epilepsy?Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Oct;142(4):314-316. doi: 10.1111/ane.13316. Epub 2020 Jul 26. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020. PMID: 32654134 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- COVIDView, key updates for week 33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Aug 21, [2022-08-11]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/covidview/past-repo... .
-
- Sim SW, Moey KSP, Tan NC. The use of facemasks to prevent respiratory infection: a literature review in the context of the Health Belief Model. Singapore Med J. 2014 Mar;55(3):160–7. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014037. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24664384 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Tao Z, Dong J, Culleton R. The use of facemasks may not lead to an increase in hand-face contact. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020 Nov;67(6):3038–3040. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13698. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32594652 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Taylor S, Asmundson GJG. Negative attitudes about facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic: the dual importance of perceived ineffectiveness and psychological reactance. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0246317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246317. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246317 PONE-D-20-35668 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Al-Ramahi M, Elnoshokaty A, El-Gayar O, Nasralah T, Wahbeh A. Public discourse against masks in the COVID-19 era: infodemiology study of Twitter data. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 05;7(4):e26780. doi: 10.2196/26780. https://publichealth.jmir.org/2021/4/e26780/ v7i4e26780 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources