Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 1;19(4):251-257.
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001119. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

Classification of Health Information Technology Safety Events in a Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital

Affiliations
Review

Classification of Health Information Technology Safety Events in a Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital

Amina Khan et al. J Patient Saf. .

Abstract

Objective: State agencies have developed reporting systems of safety events that include events related to health information technology (HIT). These data come from hospital reporting systems where staff submit safety reports and nurses, in the role of safety managers, review, and code events. Safety managers may have varying degrees of experience with identifying events related to HIT. Our objective was to review events potentially involving HIT and compare those with what was reported to the state.

Methods: We performed a structured review of 1 year of safety events from an academic pediatric healthcare system. We reviewed the free-text description of each event and applied a classification scheme derived from the AHRQ Health IT Hazard Manager and compared the results with events reported to the state as involving HIT.

Results: Of 33,218 safety events for a 1-year period, 1247 included key words related to HIT and/or were indicated by safety managers as involving HIT. Of the 1247 events, the structured review identified 769 as involving HIT. In comparison, safety managers only identified 194 of the 769 events (25%) as involving HIT. Most events, 353 (46%), not identified by safety managers were documentation issues. Of the 1247 events, the structured review identified 478 as not involving HIT while safety managers identified and reported 81 of these 478 events (17%) as involving HIT.

Conclusions: The current process of reporting safety events lacks standardization in identifying health technology contributions to safety events, which may minimize the effectiveness of safety initiatives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Magrabi F, Ong MS, Runciman W, et al. Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems. J Am Med Inform Assoc . 2012;19:45–53.
    1. Koppel R. The health information technology safety framework: building great structures on vast voids. BMJ Qual Saf . 2016;25:218–220.
    1. Sittig DF, Belmont E, Singh H. Improving the safety of health information technology requires shared responsibility: it is time we all step up. Healthcare . 2018;6:7–12.
    1. Singh H, Sittig DF. Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: the health it safety framework. BMJ Qual Saf . 2016;25:226–232.
    1. Meeks DW, Smith MW, Taylor L, et al. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. J Am Med Inform Assoc . 2014;21:1053–1059.

LinkOut - more resources