The Significance of Tumor Locations in Patients with Gallbladder Carcinoma After Curative-Intent Resection
- PMID: 37095334
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05665-1
The Significance of Tumor Locations in Patients with Gallbladder Carcinoma After Curative-Intent Resection
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the significance of tumor locations in patients with resected gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) and to supply the indication of extra-hepatic bile duct resection (EHBDR) according to tumor locations.
Methods: Patients with resected GBC from 2010 to 2020 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Comparative analyses and a meta-analysis were performed according to different tumor locations (body/fundus/neck/cystic duct).
Results: Article: A total of 259 patients were identified (neck: 71; cystic: 29; body: 51; fundus: 108). Patients with proximal tumors (neck/cystic duct) were often in a more advanced stage and had more aggressive tumor biological features as well as a worse prognosis compared with those with distal tumors (fundus/body). Moreover, the observation was even more obvious between cystic duct and non-cystic duct tumors. Cystic duct tumor was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.01). EHBDR provided no survival advantage even in those with cystic duct tumor.
Meta-analysis: With our own cohort incorporated, five studies with 204 patients with proximal tumors and 5167 patients with distal tumors were identified. Pooled results revealed that proximal tumors indicated worse tumor biological features and prognosis versus distal tumors.
Conclusion: Proximal GBC had more aggressive tumor biological features, and a worse prognosis versus distal GBC and cystic duct tumor can be regarded as an independent prognostic factor. EHBDR had no obvious survival advantage even in those with cystic duct tumor and was even harmful in those with distal tumors. Upcoming more powerful well-designed studies are required for further validation.
Keywords: Bile duct resection; Gallbladder carcinoma; Prognosis; Tumor location.
© 2023. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
References
-
- Rakić M, Patrlj L, Kopljar M, Kliček R, Kolovrat M, Loncar B et al. Gallbladder cancer. Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition. 2014;3(5):221-6. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.09.03 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Fong Y, Jarnagin W, Blumgart L. Gallbladder cancer: comparison of patients presenting initially for definitive operation with those presenting after prior noncurative intervention. Annals of surgery. 2000;232(4):557-69. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200010000-00011 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Chang J, Jang JY, Lee KB, Kang MJ, Jung W, Shin YC et al. Improvement of clinical outcomes in the patients with gallbladder cancer: lessons from periodic comparison in a tertiary referral center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23(4):234-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.330 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chen C, Geng Z, Shen H, Song H, Zhao Y, Zhang G et al. Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: Focus on the Advanced T Stage. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166361. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166361 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Yang XW, Yang J, Li L, Man XB, Zhang BH, Shen F et al. Analysis of the relationships between clinicopathologic factors and survival in gallbladder cancer following surgical resection with curative intent. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051513 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
