Non-pharmaceutical interventions in the State of Georgia: Economic implications
- PMID: 37095763
- PMCID: PMC10116346
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jemep.2023.100891
Non-pharmaceutical interventions in the State of Georgia: Economic implications
Abstract
Background: As Covid-19 spread rapidly, many countries implemented a strict shelter-in-place to "flatten the curve" and build capacity to treat in the absence of effective preventative therapies or treatments. Policymakers and public health officials must balance the positive health effects of lockdowns with economic, social, and psychological costs. This study examined the economic impacts of state and county level restrictions during the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic for two regions of Georgia.
Methods: Taking unemployment data from the Opportunity Insights Economic Tracker with mandate information from various sites, we examined trends before and after a mandate's implementation and relaxation using joinpoint regression.
Results: We found mandates with the largest impact on unemployment claims rates were the shelters-in-place (SIPs) and closures of non-essential businesses. Specific to our study, mandates had an effect where first implemented, i.e., if the state implemented an SIP after the county, the state-wide SIP had no additional measurable effect on claims rates. School closures had a consistent impact on increasing unemployment claims rates, but to a lesser degree than SIPs or business closures. While closing businesses did have a deleterious effect, implementing social distancing for businesses and restricting gatherings did not. Notably, the Coastal region was less affected than the Metro Area. Additionally, our findings indicate that race ethnicity may be a larger predictor of adverse economic effects than education, poverty level, or geographic area.
Conclusions: Our findings coincided with other studies in some areas but showed differences in what indicators may best predict adverse effects and that coastal communities may not always be as impacted as other regions in a state. Ultimately, the most restrictive measures consistently had the largest negative economic impacts. Social distancing and mask mandates can be effective for containment while mitigating the economic impacts of strict SIPs and business closures.
Keywords: Covid; Lockdown; Non-pharmaceutical intervention; Public health policy.
© 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Nonpharmaceutical Interventions in Georgia: Public Health Implications.South Med J. 2023 May;116(5):383-389. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001552. South Med J. 2023. PMID: 37137470 Free PMC article.
-
Mask Mandate's Effect on Job Loss Expectation and Mental Health in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2022 Mar 1;25(1):21-34. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2022. PMID: 35302051
-
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 36966780 Free PMC article.
-
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 37131927 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding macroeconomic indicators affected by COVID-19 containment policies in the United States: a scoping review.Health Aff Sch. 2025 Mar 6;3(4):qxaf045. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf045. eCollection 2025 Apr. Health Aff Sch. 2025. PMID: 40190702 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Schetter U., Hausmann R. Vox EU, CEPR; 2020. Horrible trade-offs in a pandemic: analysis and policy implications. [Online]. Available: https://voxeu.org/article/horrible-trade-offs-pandemic.
-
- Kanu F.A., Smith E.E., Offutt-Powell T., Hong R., Dinh T.H., Pevzner E., et al. Declines in SARS-CoV-2 transmission, hospitalizations, and mortality after implementations of mitigation measures - Delaware, March-June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:1691–1694. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6945e1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous