Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 31:18:100155.
doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2023.100155. eCollection 2023 Jun.

The safety of botulinum neurotoxin type A's intraarticular application in experimental animals

Affiliations

The safety of botulinum neurotoxin type A's intraarticular application in experimental animals

Ana Dugonjić Okroša et al. Toxicon X. .

Abstract

In vivo studies of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) enabled characterization of its activity in the nociceptive sensory system separate from its preferred action in motor and autonomic nerve terminals. However, in the recent rodent studies of arthritic pain which employed high intra-articular (i.a.) doses (expressed as a total number of units (U) per animal or U/kg), possible systemic effects have not been conclusively excluded. Herein we assessed the effect of two pharmaceutical preparations, abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A, 10, 20, and 40 U/kg corresponding to 0.05, 0.11, and 0.22 ng/kg neurotoxin) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A, 10 and 20 U/kg corresponding to 0.09 and 0.18 ng/kg, respectively) injected into the rat knee, on safety-relevant readouts: digit abduction, motor performance and weight gain during 14 days post-treatment. The i. a. toxin produced dose-dependent impairment of the toe spreading reflex and rotarod performance, which was moderate and transient after 10 U/kg onaBoNT-A and ≤20 U/kg aboBoNT-A doses, and severe and long-lasting (examined up to 14 days) after ≥20 U/kg of onaBoNT-A and 40 U/kg aboBoNT-A. In addition, lower toxin doses prevented the normal weight gain compared to controls, while higher doses induced marked weight loss (≥20 U/kg of onaBoNT-A and 40 U/kg aboBoNT-A). Commonly employed BoNT-A formulations, depending on the doses, cause local relaxation of the surrounding muscles and systemic adverse effects in rats. Thus, to evade possible toxin unwanted local or systemic spread, careful dosing and motor testing should be mandatory in preclinical behavioral studies, irrespective of the sites and doses of toxin application.

Keywords: Motor effects; Rats; Systemic spread; abobotulinumtoxinA; onabotulinumtoxinA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: This study was supported by Ipsen, Croatian Science Foundation (Project ID: IP-2014-09-4503) and University of Zagreb Support project. Mikhail Kalinichev was an employee of Ipsen Innovation, France at the time the research was conducted. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Time-course of the effect of i. a. injections of different doses of two pharmaceutical BoNT-A formulations on motor impairment (balance maintenance and fatigue), measured by rotarod performance. Saline (20 μl) or different doses of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) or onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) were injected i. a. into the knee joint. The toxin doses are expressed as mouse LD50-based units per kg (U/kg) or nanograms of 150 kDa neurotoxin per kg (ng/kg). The balance maintenance times (latency) at the rotating rotarod device (10 rpm, 180 s cutoff) were measured at baseline (day 0) and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days post-i. a. Treatments. The results (average of 3 measurements per session) are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3/treatment group), c = p < 0.001 vs. control (normal saline), two-way RM ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons tests.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The time-course of the effect of i. a. injections of different doses of two pharmaceutical BoNT-A formulations on toe spreading reflex impairment assessed by digit abduction score (DAS) assay. Saline (0.9% NaCl, 20 μl) or different doses of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) or onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) were injected i. a. into the knee joint. The doses are expressed as mouse LD50-based units per kg (U/kg) or nanograms of 150 kDa neurotoxin per kg (ng/kg). The DAS score was measured at baseline and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days post-i. a. treatments. The results (average of 3 measurements per session) are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3/treatment group), a = p < 0.05, b = p < 0.01, c = p < 0.001 vs. saline control), two-way RM ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons tests.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The time course of the effect of i. a. injections of different doses of two pharmaceutical BoNT-A formulations on the rat weight. Saline (0.9% NaCl, 20 μl) or different doses of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) or onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) were injected i. a. into the knee joint. The doses are expressed as mouse LD50-based units per kg (U/kg) or nanograms of 150 kDa neurotoxin per kg (ng/kg). The percent weight change shown at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days post-i. a. treatments were expressed as percent from baseline. The results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3/treatment group), a = p < 0.05, b = p < 0.01, c = p < 0.001 vs. control (normal saline), two-way RM ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons tests.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The effect of i. a. injections of different doses of two pharmaceutical BoNT-A formulations on the diameter of rat gastrocnemius. Saline (0.9% NaCl, 20 μl) or different doses of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) or onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) were injected i. a. into the knee joint. The doses are expressed as mouse LD50-based units per kg (U/kg) or nanograms of 150 kDa neurotoxin per kg (ng/kg). The mediolateral gastrocnemius diameter (in mm) was measured 14 days post-i. a. treatments. The results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3/treatment group), a = p < 0.05 vs. control (normal saline), one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons tests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Alberto A. Terminology for preparations of botulinum neurotoxins: what a difference a name makes. JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2011;305(1):89–90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1937. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aoki K.R., Francis J. Updates on the antinociceptive mechanism hypothesis of botulinum toxin A. Park. Relat. Disord. 2011;17(Suppl. 1):S28–S33. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.06.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bach-Rojecky L., Relja M., Lacković Z. Botulinum toxin type A in experimental neuropathic pain. J. Neural. Transm. 2005;112(2):215–219. doi: 10.1007/s00702-004-0265-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bach-Rojecky Lidija, Dominis M., Lacković Z. Lack of anti-inflammatory effect of botulinum toxin type A in experimental models of inflammation. Fund. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008;22(5):503–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2008.00615.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bach-Rojecky Lidija, Šalković-Petrišić M., Lacković Z. Botulinum toxin type A reduces pain supersensitivity in experimental diabetic neuropathy: bilateral effect after unilateral injection. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2010;633(1–3):10–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.01.020. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources