Prognosis of Unrepaired Ascending Aorta after the Surgical Replacement of Bicuspid Aortic Valves
- PMID: 37096250
- PMCID: PMC10345651
- DOI: 10.5090/jcs.23.007
Prognosis of Unrepaired Ascending Aorta after the Surgical Replacement of Bicuspid Aortic Valves
Abstract
Background: The surgical threshold for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-related aortopathy is a matter of debate due to its uncertain etiology and prognosis. This study investigated the prognosis of unrepaired BAV aortopathy in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 720 patients (age, 60.8±11.5 years; 246 women) who underwent SAVR for BAV disease without aortic repair between 2005 and 2020 at Asan Medical Center. The clinical endpoints were defined as occurrences of sudden death, aortic dissection or rupture, and elective aortic repair. To estimate postoperative changes in the dimensions of the unrepaired aorta, the individual annual aortic expansion rate was calculated. Multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the risk of aortic expansion.
Results: The mean ascending aortic diameter was 39.5±4.6 mm, and 299 patients (41.5%) had a baseline ascending aorta diameter >40 mm. During 70.0±68.3 months of follow-up, the mean annual aortic expansion rate was 0.39±1.96 mm/yr, no aortic dissection or rupture was observed, and sudden deaths were reported in 12 patients (0.34% per person-year). Linear regression analysis revealed no significant correlation between the baseline ascending aortic diameter and postoperative aortic expansion (R2=0.004, β=-0.84, p=0.082).
Conclusion: In selected patients undergoing SAVR for a BAV (<55 mm), the risk of adverse aortic events was very low. As this observation contradicts current practice guidelines advocating for proactive aortic replacement in dilated ascending aortas measuring >45 mm, the study results need further validation by studies involving larger populations or randomized controlled trials.
Keywords: Aortic valve replacement; Aortopathy; Bicuspid aortic valve disease; Prognosis.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Are normal-sized ascending aortas at risk of late aortic events after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve disease?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;22(4):465-71. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv387. Epub 2016 Jan 23. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 26803325
-
The fate of the bicuspid valve aortopathy after aortic valve replacement.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 May;45(5):e128-35. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt666. Epub 2014 Jan 30. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24482387
-
The aortic root does not dilate over time after replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valves.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;156(1):5-13.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.094. Epub 2018 Mar 13. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29656818
-
Bicuspid Aortic Valves: an Up-to-Date Review on Genetics, Natural History, and Management.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Aug;24(8):1021-1030. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01716-2. Epub 2022 Jul 22. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022. PMID: 35867195 Review.
-
Novel Approaches for BAV Aortopathy Prediction-Is There a Need for Cohort Studies and Biomarkers?Biomolecules. 2018 Jul 19;8(3):58. doi: 10.3390/biom8030058. Biomolecules. 2018. PMID: 30029528 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Ascending Aortic Progression After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients with Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul 22;39(4):e20230438. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0438. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 39038201 Free PMC article.
-
Commentary: Ascending Aortic Aneurysm: The Best Way Out Is Always Through.J Chest Surg. 2023 Jul 5;56(4):262-263. doi: 10.5090/jcs.23.056. Epub 2023 May 30. J Chest Surg. 2023. PMID: 37248714 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siu SC, Silversides CK. Bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2789–800. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.068. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Michelena HI, Khanna AD, Mahoney D, et al. Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA. 2011;306:1104–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1286. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1286. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sievers HH, Sievers HL. Aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve disease: genes or hemodynamics? or Scylla and Charybdis? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:803–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.007. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, 3rd, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2022;146:e334–482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Otto CM, Nishimura RA, et al. Writing Committee Members, author. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:e25–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials