Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1986;30(1):21-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF00614190.

Enprofylline: pharmacokinetics and comparison with theophylline of acute effects on bronchial reactivity in normal subjects

Clinical Trial

Enprofylline: pharmacokinetics and comparison with theophylline of acute effects on bronchial reactivity in normal subjects

T B Kluge et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986.

Abstract

In a double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study the pharmacokinetics and acute effects of enprofylline and theophylline on airway reactivity during histamine challenge were investigated in 10 healthy volunteers. The pharmacokinetic parameters of enprofylline were (mean): elimination half-life 1.9 h, total body clearance 191.1 ml X kg-1. h-1, volume of distribution 0.481 X kg-1, and protein binding 49%. Bronchial reactivity in the histamine inhalation test was expressed as the concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1.0 (PC20). Mean PC20 values were lowest after placebo and highest after theophylline with the enprofylline values in between. Only the difference in PC20S after placebo and theophylline was statistically significant (p less than 0.05). At the time of determination of the PC20, the serum concentration of enprofylline was between 16.5 and 11.8 mumol/l, and that of theophylline was between 78.3 and 61.1 mumol/l. Adverse actions of enprofylline were nausea (3/10) and cardiovascular reactions (2/10), whereas theophylline mainly caused restlessness (3/10) and tremor (2/10). Thus enprofylline, in one-fifth of the serum concentration of theophylline cannot be regarded as equipotent in terms of bronchoprotection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981 Nov;68(5):347-55 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;26(1):87-93 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983 Dec;34(6):799-804 - PubMed
    1. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1981 Oct;49(4):313-6 - PubMed
    1. Clin Allergy. 1977 May;7(3):235-43 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources