Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;42(8):1590-1602.
doi: 10.1002/nau.25192. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting. Part 1: Background theory and practice

Peter F W M Rosier  1 , Juan P Valdevenito  2 , Phillip Smith  3 , Sanjay Sinha  4 , John Speich  5 , Andrew Gammie  6 ; Members of the ICS Working Group PFS23
Affiliations

ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting. Part 1: Background theory and practice

Peter F W M Rosier et al. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Aims: The working group (WG) initiated by the International Continence Society Standardization Steering Committee and supported by the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction has revised the (1997) ICS Standard for pressure flow studies.

Methods: Based on the ICS standard for developing evidence-based standards, the WG developed this new ICS standard in the period from May 2020 to December 2022. A draft was posted on the ICS website in January 2023 to facilitate public discussion and the comments received have been incorporated into this final release.

Results: The WG summarizes the theory and recommends the practice and the terms used for the diagnosis of voiding dysfunction for adult female and male patients without relevant neurological abnormalities, in part 1 of this standard. The WG has also recommended standard principles and parameters for objective and continuous grading of urethral resistance and detrusor voiding contraction on the basis of pressure flow studies in part 2. The recommendations for practice in this part have also the aim to increase the understanding of the physiology as well as the psychology of voiding. The potential effects of the laboratory situation of the test on the voiding as well as the role of the urodynamicist in this regard are discussed. The WG has recommended to use for diagnosis only the voidings that are considered representative by the patient.

Conclusion: A pressure flow study is the gold standard to assess voiding function and to quantify dysfunction. This part of the standard explains the clinical background, gives recommendations for the execution of a pressure flow study and lists relevant terms, parameters, and units of measurements.

Keywords: bladder outflow obstruction; clinical practice guideline; detrusor contractility; expert consensus; healthcare quality; lower urinary tract dysfunction; pressure flow study; standardization; underactive detrusor contraction; urodynamic; voiding dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Griffiths D, Höfner K, van Mastrigt R, Rollema HJ, Spångberg A, Gleason D. Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstruction. Neurourol Urodyn. 1997;16(1):1-18. doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1997)16:1%3C1::aid-nau1%3E3.0.co;2-i
    1. Rosier PFWM, Schaefer W, Lose G, et al. International Continence Society good urodynamic practices and terms 2016: urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(5):1243-1260. doi:10.1002/nau.23124
    1. Rosier PFWM, de Ridder D, Meijlink J, Webb R, Whitmore K, Drake MJ. Developing evidence-based standards for diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract or pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(5):621-624. doi:10.1002/nau.21253
    1. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies**: good urodynamic practices guidelines. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261-274. doi:10.1002/nau.10066
    1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-178. doi:10.1002/nau.10052

LinkOut - more resources