Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Apr 25:32:e27.
doi: 10.1017/S2045796023000197.

Psychiatric advance directives facilitated by peer workers among people with mental illness: economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial (DAiP study)

S Loubière  1   2 , A Loundou  1   2 , P Auquier  1   2 , A Tinland  2   3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Psychiatric advance directives facilitated by peer workers among people with mental illness: economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial (DAiP study)

S Loubière et al. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. .

Abstract

Aims: We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of psychiatric advance directives (PAD) facilitated by peer workers (PW-PAD) in the management of patients with mental disorders in France.

Methods: In a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial, we randomly assigned adults with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorders, who were compulsorily hospitalized in the past 12 months, to either fill out a PAD form and meet a peer worker for facilitation or receive usual care. We assessed differences in societal costs in euros (€) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a year-long follow-up to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the PW-PAD strategy. We conducted multiple sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results.

Results: Among the 394 randomized participants, 196 were assigned to the PW-PAD group and 198 to the control group. Psychiatric inpatient costs were lower in the PW-PAD group than the control group (relative risk, -0.22; 95% confidence interval, [-0.33 to -0.11]; P < 0.001), and 1-year cumulative savings were obtained for the PW-PAD group (mean difference, -€4,286 [-4,711 to -4,020]). Twelve months after PW-PAD implementation, we observed improved health utilities (difference, 0.040 [0.003-0.077]; P = 0.032). Three deaths occurred. QALYs were higher in the PW-PAD group (difference, 0.045 [0.040-0.046]). In all sensitivity analyses, taking into account sampling uncertainty and unit variable variation, PW-PAD was likely to remain a cost-effective use of resources.

Conclusion: PW-PAD was strictly dominant, that is, less expensive and more effective compared with usual care for people living with mental illness.

Keywords: health economics; mental health; other psychosocial techniques/treatments; psychiatric services; randomized controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Cost-effectiveness plane associated with the 12-month cost per QALY analysis.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
One-way sensitivity analysis of cost-effectiveness associated with PW-PAD intervention.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ambrosini D and Crocker A (2010) Les directives psychiatriques anticipées (DPA) et le rôle de l’autonomie. Santé Mentale au Québec 34(2), 51–74. - PubMed
    1. Appelbaum PS and Grisso T (1995) The MacArthur treatment competence study. I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment. Law and Human Behavior 19(2), 105–126. - PubMed
    1. Atkinson JM, Garner HC, Patrick H and Stuart S (2003) Issues in the development of advance directives in mental health care. Journal of Mental Health 12(5), 463–474.
    1. Barbui C, Purgato M, Abdulmalik J, Caldas-de-almeida JM, Eaton J, Gureje O, Hanlon C, Nosè M, Ostuzzi G, Saraceno B, Saxena S, Tedesch F and Thornicroft G (2021) Efficacy of interventions to reduce coercive treatment in mental health services: Umbrella review of randomised evidence. British Journal of Psychiatry 218(4), 185–195. - PubMed
    1. Barrett B, Waheed W, Farrelly S, Birchwood M, Dunn G, Flach C, Henderson C, Leese M, Lester H, Marshall M and Rose D (2013) Randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment for people with psychosis: Economic outcomes. PLoS One 8(11), e74210. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types