Older Patient Receptivity to the Integration of Patient Portals and Telehealth in Urogynecology: Promoters and Deterrents
- PMID: 37097215
- DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001359
Older Patient Receptivity to the Integration of Patient Portals and Telehealth in Urogynecology: Promoters and Deterrents
Abstract
Importance: Limited studies focus on the integration of online portals, including telehealth services, in urogynecology while identifying promoters and deterrents of utilization, especially for the older population.
Objective: This study aimed to identify facilitators, concerns, technical or personal issues encountered, and the desired features of the online patient portals among older urogynecology patients.
Study design: This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of older patients (≥65 years). The survey was devised using 2 focus groups with questions addressing older patient practicality and comfort with virtual visits for menopause and urogynecology-specific conditions.
Results: A total of 205 patients completed the study. Promoters of use included health care professional encouragement, enrollment on site with concurrent education, and clarification of relevance of the virtual care to one's care. Patients who were uncomfortable with portal use reported anxiety and technical issues as deterrents for using such technology. More than half of the patients were comfortable having online visits for preoperative (51.7%), postoperative (66.3%), and medical management (73.7%). Up to 60.5% of the patients believed that virtual visits were equally stressful as in-person visits, whereas 24.4% believed that the logistics of in-person visits were the cause of stress.
Conclusions: To improve access to care, augment the utilization of online patient portals, and combat ageism, enhancing the older urogynecologic patient's portal experience is vital. Investment in this population's needs includes education of patients, active enrollment, and engagement by health care systems, and addressing technical concerns.
Copyright © 2023 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
D.Z. has been a surgical proctor and educator for Applied Medical in the past year. Y.H. has no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Stanziola AA, Salzano A, D'Angelo R, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis telemedicine management during COVID-19 outbreak. Open Med (Wars) . 2022;17(1):689–693. doi: 10.1515/med-2022-0466. - DOI
-
- Chen M, Said NM, Rais NCM, et al. Remaining agile in the COVID-19 pandemic healthcare landscape—how we adopted a hybrid telemedicine geriatric oncology care model in an academic tertiary cancer center. J Geriatr Oncol . 2022;13:856–861.
-
- Fernando ME, Seng L, Drovandi A, et al. Effectiveness of remotely delivered interventions to simultaneously optimize management of hypertension, hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia in people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) . 2022;13:848695. doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.848695. - DOI
-
- Metzger GA, Cooper J, Lutz C, et al. Examining the utility of preoperative telemedicine care across multiple pediatric surgery disciplines. J Surg Res . 2022;277:138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.023. - DOI
-
- Ye IB, Thomson AE, Chowdhury N, et al. Telemedicine improves access to care for spine patients with low socioeconomic status. Global Spine J . 2022;21925682221092398. doi: 10.1177/21925682221092398. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical