Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul;23(7):147-163.
doi: 10.1007/s11892-023-01509-z. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

Using Mixed Methods Research in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: a Methodological Review

Sara L Davis  1 , Sarah S Jaser  2 , Nataliya V Ivankova  3 , Trey Lemley  4 , Marti Rice  5
Affiliations
Review

Using Mixed Methods Research in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: a Methodological Review

Sara L Davis et al. Curr Diab Rep. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Many factors influence disease management and glycemic levels in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, these concepts are hard to examine in children using only a qualitative or quantitative research paradigm. Mixed methods research (MMR) offers creative and unique ways to study complex research questions in children and their families.

Recent findings: A focused, methodological literature review revealed 20 empirical mixed methods research (MMR) studies that included children with T1D and/or their parents/caregivers. These studies were examined and synthesized to elicit themes and trends in MMR. Main themes that emerged included disease management, evaluation of interventions, and support. There were multiple inconsistencies between studies when reporting MMR definitions, rationales, and design. Limited studies use MMR approaches to examine concepts related to children with T1D. Findings from future MMR studies, especially ones that use child-report, may illuminate ways to improve disease management and lead to better glycemic levels and health outcomes.

Keywords: Children; Diabetes management; Mixed methods research; Socio-ecological framework; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram detailing review strategy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hood KK, Peterson CM, Rohan JM, Drotar D. Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):e1171–9. 10.1542/peds.2009-0207. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, et al. Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry. Dia Care. 2015;38(6):971–8. 10.2337/dc15-0078. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orchard TJ, Nathan DM, Zinman B, et al. Association between 7 years of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes and long-term mortality. JAMA. 2015;313(1):45. 10.1001/jama.2014.16107. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tashakkori A, Creswell JW. Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(1):3–7. 10.1177/2345678906293042. - DOI
    1. NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. 2nd ed. National Institutes of Health; 2018.

Publication types