Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;18(12):2179-2189.
doi: 10.1007/s11548-023-02907-0. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

Automated computation of radiographic parameters of distal radial metaphyseal fractures in forearm X-rays

Affiliations

Automated computation of radiographic parameters of distal radial metaphyseal fractures in forearm X-rays

Avigail Suna et al. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Radiographic parameters (RPs) provide objective support for effective decision making in determining clinical treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs). This paper presents a novel automatic RP computation pipeline for computing the six anatomical RPs associated with DRFs in anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) forearm radiographs.

Methods: The pipeline consists of: (1) segmentation of the distal radius and ulna bones with six 2D Dynamic U-Net deep learning models; (2) landmark points detection and distal radius axis computation from the segmentations with geometric methods; (3) RP computation and generation of a quantitative DRF report and composite AP and LAT radiograph images. This hybrid approach combines the advantages of deep learning and model-based methods.

Results: The pipeline was evaluated on 90 AP and 93 LAT radiographs for which ground truth distal radius and ulna segmentations and RP landmarks were manually obtained by expert clinicians. It achieves an accuracy of 94 and 86% on the AP and LAT RPs, within the observer variability, and an RP measurement difference of 1.4 ± 1.2° for the radial angle, 0.5 ± 0.6 mm for the radial length, 0.9 ± 0.7 mm for the radial shift, 0.7 ± 0.5 mm for the ulnar variance, 2.9 ± 3.3° for the palmar tilt and 1.2 ± 1.0 mm for the dorsal shift.

Conclusion: Our pipeline is the first fully automatic method that accurately and robustly computes the RPs for a wide variety of clinical forearm radiographs from different sources, hand orientations, with and without cast. The computed accurate and reliable RF measurements may support fracture severity assessment and clinical management.

Keywords: Deep learning; Distal radius fracture; Radiographic parameters; Surgical decision support; X-ray images.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crowe S, Massenburg B, Massenburg C, Morrison B, Morrison D (2020) Global trends of hand and wrist trauma: a systematic analysis of fracture and digit amputation using the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. Inj Prev 26(2):i115–i124 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rundgren J, Bojan A, Mellstrand Navarro C, Enocson A (2020) Epidemiology, classification, treatment and mortality of distal radius fractures in adults: an observational study of 23,394 fractures from the National Swedish fracture register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21(1):1–9 - DOI
    1. Kamal RN, Shapiro LM (2020) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. American Society for Surgery of the Hand Clinical Practice Guideline summary management of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthopaedic Surg 30(4):e480ee486.
    1. Solgaard S (1988) Function after distal radius fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 59(1):39–42 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brogren E, Hofer M, Petranek M, Wagner P, Dahlin LB, Atroshi I (2011) Relationship between distal radius fracture malunion and arm-related disability: a prospective population-based cohort study with 1-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12(1):1–9 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources