Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Aug;18(4):1393-1402.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01383-4. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

Cost-effectiveness of general practitioner- versus surgeon-led colon cancer survivorship care: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost-effectiveness of general practitioner- versus surgeon-led colon cancer survivorship care: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial

Julien A M Vos et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess cost-effectiveness of general practitioner (GP) versus surgeon-led colon cancer survivorship care from a societal perspective.

Methods: We performed an economic evaluation alongside the I CARE study, which included 303 cancer patients (stages I-III) who were randomised to survivorship care by a GP or surgeon. Questionnaires were administered at baseline, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 36-months. Costs included healthcare costs (measured by iMTA MCQ) and lost productivity costs (SF-HLQ). Disease-specific quality of life (QoL) was measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score and general QoL using EQ-5D-3L quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Missing data were imputed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated to relate costs to effects on QoL. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping.

Results: Total societal costs of GP-led care were significantly lower compared to surgeon-led care (mean difference of - €3895; 95% CI - €6113; - €1712). Lost productivity was the main contributor to the difference in societal costs (- €3305; 95% CI - €5028; - €1739). The difference in QLQ-C30 summary score over time between groups was 1.33 (95% CI - 0.049; 3.15). The ICER for QLQ-C30 was - 2073, indicating that GP-led care is dominant over surgeon-led care. The difference in QALYs was - 0.021 (95% CI - 0.083; 0.040) resulting in an ICER of 129,164.

Conclusions: GP-led care is likely to be cost-effective for disease-specific QoL, but not for general QoL.

Implications for cancer survivors: With a growing number of cancer survivors, GP-led survivorship care could help to alleviate some of the burden on more expensive secondary healthcare services.

Keywords: Cancer survivors; Colon cancer; Cost–benefit analysis; Primary health care; Quality of healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cost-effectiveness figures. CE plane = cost-effectiveness plane, CEA curve cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, QALY quality-adjusted life year, EORTC QLQ-C30 European organization for research and treatment for cancer quality of life questionnaire

References

    1. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66(4):683–91. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
    1. Qaderi SM, Dickman PW, de Wilt JHW, Verhoeven RHA. Conditional survival and cure of patients with colon or rectal cancer: a population-based study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(9):1230–7. 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7568 - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS) [Internet]. Accessed 11th of May 2022. [Available from: https://www.vzinfo.nl/dikkedarmkanker/zorguitgaven].
    1. Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Van der Linden N, Bouwmans CAM, et al. Costing manual: methodology of costing research and reference prices for economic evaluations in healthcare. Diemen: Dutch Healthcare Institute; 2016.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources